Антропоцентрическая парадигма современного гуманитарного знания. Антропоцентрическая парадигма современного гуманитарного знания.. Д. И. Иванов, Д. Л. Лакербай антропоцентрическая парадигма современного гуманитарного знания метадисциплинарный дом теорий рассматривается оригинальная конфигурация метадисциплинарного
 Скачать 0.51 Mb.
|
1 2 Keywords: research strategies, synthetic language personality, cognitive-pragmatic program, cognitive-pragmatic sets, subject-language space. This article considers the original configuration of “metadisciplinary” knowledge that appeared based on original authors’ theories. The focus is on their individual prospects as well as on the “integral” potential due to the rootedness in the basic principles of modern liberal arts: anthropology, cognition, discursiveness. By the example of authors’ theories, the flexibility and variability of the “synthetic” methodology are demonstrated. The variant of metadisciplinarity proposed in the article proceeds from the cross- borderness within the metadisciplinary object – language in its global cultural dimension. Two research strategies as the components of this variant (the “house of theories”) are described here. The cognitive-pragmatic strategy A includes two original concepts and develops in the following coordinates: anthropocentric paradigm (AP) – synthetic text (ST) – synthetic language personality (SLP) – cognitive-pragmatic program (CPP). The basic concept is the SLP theory originated as a methodological support for the study of the synthetic text of the Russian rock culture, but it turned out to be much broader than the original object of analysis and applicable to the analysis of synthetic texts of all types, as well as in cases of non- standard discourse. The logically necessary basis for further research is the theory of cognitive-pragmatic programs that allows carrying out systemic structural, cognitive, conceptual and semantic analysis of linguistic and communicative consciousness, to deeply reveal the processes of cognitive interaction between the subject-source and the subject- interpreter. The meaning of the style strategy B is the literary projection of all new knowledge about the linguistic cognitive subject. The strategy combines this structural-component knowledge with the hermeneutics of the “organic” style tradition. The idea of language is common for both strategies, while the style appears as a unique realization by the creative subject-source of its CPP in a special subject-linguistic space, the space of co-creation of a language and a person. The place of the habitual “image of the author” is taken by the resultant linguistic (stylistic) subject – the language personality through the eyes of a literary critic. The “crossroads” of strategies A and B is a discursive theory of interpretation. The presence in the SLP theory of an associative-interpretational level means that the synthetic 192 Д.И. Иванов, Д.Л. Лакербай text really lives in contact with its audience, that the subject-source of the synthetic text within its CPP seeks to set the type of interpretation somehow, but the subject-interpreter turns this process into a probabilistic one. Interpretation here through the SLP CPP is embedded in the structure of the text, which is extended beyond the verbal limits. If the interpreter-researcher has an aversion or misunderstanding of the CPP implemented in the text, then, perhaps, this is a “program error” of interpretation, a discursive substitution, one of the reasons for which may be the hidden synthetic text. Thus, the anthropocentric paradigm, the cognitive-discursive approach and the “poetics of the subject” unite innovative concepts of the synthetic language personality, cognitive- pragmatic programs, individual style as a product of a joint “transcendence” of a language and a person, as well as a cognitive-discursive theory of interpretation. References 1. Benveniste, E. (1974) Obshchaya lingvistika [Problems in general linguistics]. Translated from French. Moscow: Progress. 2. Stepanov, Yu.S. (1985) V trekhmernom prostranstve yazyka: (Semioticheskie problemy lingvistiki, filosofii, iskusstva) [In the three-dimensional space of the language: (Semiotic problems of linguistics, philosophy, art)]. Moscow: Nauka. 3. Dem’yankov, V.Z. (1995) Dominiruyushchie lingvisticheskie teorii v kontse XX veka [Dominant linguistic theories at the end of the twentieth century]. In: Stepanov, Yu.S. (ed.) Yazyk i nauka kontsa 20 veka [Language and science of the end of the 20th century]. Moscow: RSUH. 4. Karaulov, Yu.N. (1987) Russkiy yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’ [Russian language and language personality]. Moscow: Nauka. 5. Arutyunova, N.D. (1988) Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy [Types of language meanings]. Moscow: Nauka. 6. Kubryakova, E.S. (1995) Evolyutsiya lingvisticheskikh idey vo vtoroy polovine XX veka: opyt paradigmal’nogo analiza [The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the twentieth century: the experience of paradigm analysis]. In: Stepanov, Yu.S. (ed.) Yazyk i nauka kontsa 20 veka [Language and science of the end of the 20th century]. Moscow: RSUH. 7. Postovalova, V.I. (2002) Yazyk i miropostizhenie: filosofiya yazyka V. fon Gumbol’dta i kognitivnaya lingvistika [Language and worldview: W. von Humboldt’s philosophy of language and cognitive linguistics]. In: S lyubov’yu k yazyku [With a love of language]. Moscow: IL RAS; Voronezh: Voronezh State University. pp. 72–89. 8. Postovalova, V.I. (1999) Lingvokul’turologiya v svete antropologicheskoy paradigmy (k probleme osnovaniy i granits sovremennoy frazeologii) [Linguoculturology in the light of the anthropological paradigm (to the problem of the bases and boundaries of modern phraseology)]. In: Teliya, V.N. (ed.) Frazeologiya v kontekste kul’tury [Phraseology in the context of culture]. Moscow: YaSK. 9. Dem’yankov, V.Z. (2006) Termin paradigma v obydennom yazyke i v lingvistike [The term ‘paradigm’ in everyday language and linguistics]. In: Paradigmy nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennoy lingvistike [Paradigms of scientific knowledge in modern linguistics]. Moscow: ISISS RAS. 10. Khomutova, T.N. (2009) Nauchnye paradigmy v lingvistike [Scientific paradigms in linguistics]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie – Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin. Series: Philology. Art Criticism. 35 (173):37. pp. 142–151. 11. Lykova, N.A. (1999) Kontinual’noe i diskretnoe v yazyke [The continual and the discrete in language]. Filologicheskie nauki – Philological Sciences. 6. pp. 54–62. 12. Kubryakova, E.S. (2004) Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya: Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge: Антропоцентрическая парадигма современного знания 193 Towards the acquisition of knowledge about the language: Parts of speech from a cognitive point of view: The role of language in cognizing the world]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury. 13. Vorob’ev, V.V. (1997) Lingvokul’turologiya (teoriya i metody) [Linguoculturology (theory and methods)]. Moscow: RUDN. 14. Teliya, V.N. (2002) Ob”ekt lingvokul’turologii mezhdu Stsilloy lingvokreativnoy tekhniki yazyka i Kharibdoy kul’tury [The object of linguoculturology between the Scylla of linguocreative language technique and the Charybdis of culture]. In: S lyubov’yu k yazyku [With a love of language]. Moscow: IL RAS; Voronezh: Voronezh State University. 15. Karaulov, Yu.N. (1989) Predislovie: Russkaya yazykovaya lichnost’ i zadachi ee izucheniya [Preface: Russian language personality and the objectives of its study]. In: Smelyov, D.N. (ed.) Yazyk i lichnost’ [Language and personality]. Moscow: Nauka. 16. Kasavin, I.T. (2010) Vvedenie [Introduction]. In: Kasavin, I.T. (ed.) Mezhdistsiplinarnost’ v naukakh i filosofii [Interdisciplinarity in the sciences and philosophy]. Moscow: IPh RAS. 17. Zykova, I.V. (2016) Lingvokreativnost’ s pozitsii lingvokul’turologii: teoriya, metod, analiz [Linguistic creativity from the perspective of linguoculturology: theory, method, analysis]. In: Krasnykh, V.V. & Izotov, A.I. (eds) Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya [Language, consciousness, communication]. Is. 53. Moscow: MAKS Press. 18. Sviridov, S.V. (2002) Rok-iskusstvo i problema sinteticheskogo teksta [Rock art and the problem of synthetic text]. In: Domanskiy, Yu.V. & Kozitskaya, E.A. (eds) Russkaya rok- poeziya: tekst i kontekst [Russian rock poetry: text and context]. Is. 6. Tver: Tver State University. 19. Ivanov, D.I. (2008) Rok-al’bom 1980-kh godov kak sinteticheskiy tekst: Yu. Shevchuk “Plastun” [1980s rock album as synthetic text: Yu. Shevchuk “Plastun”]. Ivanovo: Episheva. 20. Gavrikov, V.A. (2011) Russkaya pesennaya poeziya XX veka kak tekst [Russian song poetry of the twentieth century as a text]. Bryansk: Bryanskoe SRP VOG. 21. Domanskiy, Yu.V. (2006) Variativnost’ i interpretatsiya teksta (paradigma neklassicheskoy khudozhestvennosti) [Variability and interpretation of the text (the paradigm of non-classical artistry)]. Philology Dr. Diss. Moscow. 22. Syrov, V.N. (1997) Stilevye metamorfozy roka, ili Put’ k “tret’ey muzyke” [Style metamorphosis of rock, or The way to the “third music”]. N. Novgorod: N. Novgorod State University. 23. Bakhtin, M.M. (2003) K voprosam metodologii estetiki slovesnogo tvorchestva: I. Problema formy, soderzhaniya i materiala v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [On the methodology of aesthetics of verbal creativity: I. The problem of form, content and material in verbal art creativity]. In: Bocharov, S.G. & Nikolaev, N.I. (eds) Sobr. soch.: v 7 t. [Collected Works: in 7 vols]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 24. Ivanov, D.I. (2016) Teoriya sinteticheskoy yazykovoy lichnosti: v 2 t. [The theory of a synthetic langauge personality]. Vol. 1. Ivanovo: PresSto. 25. Ivanov, D.I. (2017) Teoriya sinteticheskoy yazykovoy lichnosti: v 2 t. [The theory of a synthetic langauge personality]. Vol. 2. Ivanovo: PresSto. 26. Fadeeva, I.E. (2008) Kul’turnaya identichnost’ kak semioticheskaya problema [Cultural Identity as a Semiotic Problem]. Spivak, D.L. (ed.) Fundamental’nye problemy kul’turologii: v 4 t. [Fundamental Problems of Cultural Studies: in 4 vols]. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. 27. Karasik, V.I. (2007) Diskursivnaya personologiya [Discursive Personology]. Yazyk, kommunikatsiya i sotsial’naya sreda – Language, Communication and Social Environment. 7. pp. 78–85. 28. Anikin, D.V. (2004) Issledovanie yazykovoy lichnosti sostavitelya “Povesti vremennykh let” [The study of the language personality of the compiler of “The Tale of Bygone Years”]. Philology Cand. Diss. Barnaul. 194 Д.И. Иванов, Д.Л. Лакербай 29. Khuranova, L.A. (2017) A. Typology of Language Personality in domestic and foreign ligustics. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of Vyatka State University. 5. pp. 75–80. (In Russian). 30. Golev, N.D., Saykova, N.V. & Khomich, E.P. (eds) (2006) Lingvopersonologiya: tipy yazykovykh lichnostey i lichnostno-orientirovannoe obuchenie [Linguopersonology: types of language personalities and personality-centered learning]. Barnaul; Kemerovo: BSPU. 31. Karasik, V.I. (2002) Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena. 32. Maslova, V.A. (2001) Lingvokul’turologiya [Linguoculturology]. Moscow: Akademiya. 33. Sedov, K.F. (2004) Diskurs i lichnost’: evolyutsiya kommunikativnoy kompetentsii [Discourse and personality: the evolution of communicative competence]. Moscow: Labirint. 34. Zvegintsev, V.A. (2001) Yazyk i lingvisticheskaya teoriya [Language and linguistic theory]. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 35. Baranov, A.G. (2006) [Semiotic personality: code transitions]. Rechevaya deyatel’nost’. Yazykovoe soznanie. Obshchayushchiesya lichnosti [Speech activity. Linguistic consciousness. Communicating personalities]. Abstracts of 15th International Symposium on Psycholinguistics and Communication Theory. Moscow; Kaluga: [s.n.]. pp. 30–31. (In Russian). 36. Arutyunova, N.D. (1990) Diskurs [Discourse]. In: Yartseva, V.N. (ed.) Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sov. ents. 37. Susov, I.P. (2007) Vvedenie v yazykoznanie [Introduction to linguistics]. Moscow: AST: Vostok – Zapad. 38. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2001) Diskurs kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy [Discourse as an object of linguistic research]. In: Tekst i diskurs: Problemy ekonomicheskogo diskursa [Text and Discourse: Problems of Economic Discourse]. St. Petersburg: SPbSUEF. 39. Dem’yankov, V.Z. (2005) Tekst i diskurs kak terminy i kak slova obydennogo yazyka [Text and discourse as terms and as words of an ordinary language]. In: Toporov, V.N. (ed.) Yazyk. Lichnost’. Tekst [Language. Personality. Text]. Moscow: YaSK. 40. Stepanov, Yu.S. (1995) Al’ternativnyy mir, Diskurs, Fakt i Printsip prichinnosti [Alternative World, Discourse, Fact and Principle of Causality]. In: Stepanov, Yu.S. (ed.) Yazyk i nauka kontsa 20 veka [Language and science of the end of the 20th century]. Moscow: RSUH. 41. Kubryakova, E.S. (2005) O termine “diskurs” i stoyashchey za nim strukture znaniya [On the term “discourse” and the structure of knowledge behind it]. In: Toporov, V.N. (ed.) Yazyk. Lichnost’. Tekst [Language. Personality. Text]. Moscow: YaSK. 42. Plotnikova, S.N. (2008) Govoryashchiy / pishushchiy kak yazykovaya, kommunikativnaya i diskursivnaya lichnost’ [Speaker/writer as a linguistic, communicative and discursive personality]. Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University. 4. pp. 37–42. 43. Sinel’nikova, L.N. (2011) Scientific legitimacy of the notion “discursive personality”. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Seriya: Filologiya. Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii – Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Series “Filology. Social С. 24 (63):2(1). pp. 454–463. (In Russian). 44. Stepanov, Yu.S. (2004) Konstanty: Slovar’ russkoy kul’tury [Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt. 45. Sternin, I.A. (2002) Kommunikativnoe i kognitivnoe soznanie [Communicative and cognitive consciousness]. In: S lyubov’yu k yazyku [With a love of language]. Moscow: IL RAS; Voronezh: Voronezh State University. 46. Pasternak, B.L. (2004) Poln. sobr. soch.: v 11 t. [Complete Works: in 11 vols]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Khud. lit. pp. 148–238. Антропоцентрическая парадигма современного знания 195 47. Tynyanov, Yu.N. (1977) Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of Literature. Cinema]. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 168–195. 48. Ivanov, D.I. & Lakerbay, D.L. (2017) Teoriya sub”ektnosti teksta i russkaya poeziya XX veka [The theory of subjectivity of the text and Russian poetry of the twentieth century]. Ivanovo: PresSto. 49. Popova, Z.D. & Sternin, I.A. (2007) Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Moscow: AST: Vostok – Zapad. 50. Korotchenko, E.P. (2001) Metanarratsiya [Metanarration]. In: Gritsanov, A.A. & Mozheyko, M.A. (eds) Postmodernizm: entsikl. [Postmodernism: Encyclopedia]. Minsk: Interpresservis; Knizhnyy Dom. 51. Bashlachev, A. (1986) Beseda A. Bashlacheva s A. Shipenko i B. Yukhanovym. “Bylo by soderzhanie – formy pridut” [A. Bashlachev’s interview with A. Shipenko and B. Yukhanov. “If there is content, the form will come”]. [Online] Available from: http://bashlach.chat.ru/int04.htm. 52. Kosov, A.V. (2007) Mentality as outlook system and component of myth- consciousness. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii – Methodology and History of Psychology. 2 (3). pp. 75–90. (In Russian). 53. Berdyaev, N. (2008) Sud’ba Rossii [The fate of Russia]. Moscow: Eksmo. pp. 7–22. 54. Esenin, S.A. (1995) Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 7 t. [Complete Works: in 7 vols]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka: Golos. 55. Domanskiy, Yu.V. (2000) “Teksty smerti” russkogo roka: posobie k spetsseminaru [“Texts of the death” of Russian rock: a manual for a special seminar]. Tver: Tver State University. 56. Naumov, L. (2010) Aleksandr Bashlachev. Chelovek poyushchiy: Stikhi, biografiya, materialy [Alexander Bashlachev. The Man Singing: Poems, Biography, Materials]. St. Petersburg: Amfora. 57. Ivanov, D.I. & Lakerbay, D.L. (2018) S.A. Yesenin’s Phenomenon as a Synthetic Text: Preliminaries. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik – New Philological Bulletin. 1 (44). pp. 127–137. (In Russian). 58. Ivanov, D.I. & Lakerbay, D.L. (2018) Cognitive-pragmatic program of the linguistic personality of S. Yesenin: subsystem of target attitudes. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 3 (81):1. pp. 20–24. (In Russian). 59. Ivanov, D.I. & Lakerbay, D.L. (2017) The logocentric program of linguistic personality of J. Brodsky: preliminary remarks. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 7 (73):1. pp. 24–27. (In Russian). 60. Ivanov, D.I. & Lakerbay, D.L. (2017) Cognitive-pragmatic program of I. Brodsky’s linguistic personality: the system of goals. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 12 (78):2. pp. 29–32. (In Russian). 61. Ivanov, D.I. & Lakerbay, D.L. (2017) Text, style, individual style in linguistics and literary criticism: comments to generally accepted concepts. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 4 (70):2. pp. 18–22. (In Russian). 62. Zholkovskiy, A.K. (1994) “Bluzhdayushchie sny” i drugie raboty [“Wandering dreams” and other works]. Moscow: Nauka, Vost. lit. pp. 247–275. 1 2 |