Главная страница
Навигация по странице:

  • The word-stock of a language may be represented as a definite system in which different aspects of words may be singled out as interdependent.

  • For our purpose, i.e. for linguistic stylistics, a special type of classi­fication, viz. stylistic classification, is most important.

  • -Common Literary Vocabulary -Neutral Words -Common CoUo^uiaL Vocabulary -Profession­alisms i special Colloquial Vocabulary (non-Literary)

  • The common literary, neutral and common colloquial words are grouped under the term standard English vocabu­lary

  • Английского языка


    Скачать 1.13 Mb.
    НазваниеАнглийского языка
    АнкорGalperin I.R. Stylistics (1981).doc
    Дата25.02.2017
    Размер1.13 Mb.
    Формат файлаdoc
    Имя файлаGalperin I.R. Stylistics (1981).doc
    ТипДокументы
    #3089
    страница8 из 37
    1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   37

    PART II STYLISTIC CLASSIFICATION OF THE ENGLISH VOCABULARY

    I. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS


    Like any linguistic issue the classification of the vocabulary here suggested is for purely stylistic purposes. This is important for the course in as much as some SDs are based on the interplay of different stylistic aspects of words. It follows then that a discussion of the ways the English vocabulary can be classified from a stylistic point of view should be given proper attention.

    In order to get a more or less clear idea of the word-stock of any lan­guage, it must be presented as a system, the elements of which are in­terconnected, interrelated and yet independent. Some linguists, who clearly see the systematic character of language as a whole, deny, how­ever, the possibility of systematically classifying the vocabulary. They say that the word-stock of any language is so large and so heterogeneous that it is impossible to formalize it and therefore present it in any system. The words of a language are thought of as a chaotic body whether viewed from their origin and development or from their present state. .

    Indeed, the coinage of new lexical units, the development of meaning, the differentiation of words according to their stylistic evaluation and their spheres of usage, the correlation between meaning and concept and other problems connected with vocabulary are so multifarious and varied that it is difficult to grasp the systematic character of the word-stock of a language, though it co-exists with the systems of other levels—phone­tics, morphology and syntax.

    To deny the systematic character of the word-stock of a language amounts to denying the systematic character of language as a whole, words being elements in the general system of language.

    The word-stock of a language may be represented as a definite system in which different aspects of words may be singled out as interdependent. A special branch of linguistic science —lexicology—has done much to classify vocabulary. A glance at the contents of any book on lexicology will suffice to ascertain the outline of the system of the word-stock of the given language.

    For our purpose, i.e. for linguistic stylistics, a special type of classi­fication, viz. stylistic classification, is most important.

    In accordance with the already-mentioned division of language into literary and colloquial, we may represent the whole of the word-stock

    -Speciai Literary Vocabulary

    -Common Literary Vocabulary

    -Neutral Words

    -Common CoUo^uiaL Vocabulary

    -Profession­alisms i special Colloquial Vocabulary (non-Literary)

    of the English language as being divided into three main layers: the literary layer, the neutral layer and the collo­quial l а у е r. The literary and the colloquial layers contain a num­ber of subgroups each of which has a property it shares with all the sub­groups within the layer. This common property, which unites the differ­ent groups of words within the layer, may be called its aspect. The as­pect of the literary layer is its markedly bookish character. It is this that makes the layer more or less stable. The aspect of the colloquial layer of words is its lively spoken character. It is this that makes it unstable, fleeting.

    The aspect of the neutral layer is its universal character. That means it is unrestricted in its use. It can be employed in all styles of language and in all spheres of human activity. It is this that makes the layer the most stable of all.

    The literary layer of words consists of groups accepted as legitimate members of the English vocabulary. They have no local or dialectal character. '

    The colloquial layer of words as qualified in most English or Amer­ican dictionaries is not infrequently limited to a definite language community or confined to a special locality where it circulates.

    The literary vocabulary consists of the following groups of words: 1. common literary; 2. terms and learned words; 3. poetic words; 4. archaic words; 5. barbarisms and foreign words; 6. literary coinages including nonce-words.

    The colloquial vocabulary falls into the following groups: 1. com­mon "colloquial words; 2. slang; 3. jargonisms; 4. professional words; 5. dialectal words; 6. vulgar words; 7. colloquial coinages.

    The common literary, neutral and common colloquial words are grouped under the term standard English vocabu­lary. Other groups in the literary layer are regarded as special literary vocabulary ^id those in the collpquial layer are regarded as special collo­quial, (non-literary) vocabulary. The accompanying diagram on p. 71 illustrates this classification graphically.

    1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   37


    написать администратору сайта