ВРТ1. Название Стр
 Скачать 1.93 Mb.
|
|
130. Colpi GM, Piediferro G, Nerva F, Giacchetta D, Colpi EM, Piatti E. Sperm retrieval for intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Minerva Urol Nefrol [Internet]. 2005;57(2):99–107. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15951734 131. Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, Van der Aa F. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology [Internet]. 2014;2(1):20–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24193894 132. Krausz C, Degl’Innocenti S. Y chromosome and male infertility: update, 2006. Front Biosci [Internet]. 2006;11:3049–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16720375 133. Ghanem M, Bakr NI, Elgayaar MA, El Mongy S, Fathy H, Ibrahim A-HA. Comparison of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia in the first cycle: a report of case series and meta-analysis. Int J Androl [Internet]. 2005;28(1):16–21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15679616 134. Vernaeve V, Tournaye H, Osmanagaoglu K, Verheyen G, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa is less successful in men with nonobstructive azoospermia than in men with obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2003;79(3):529–33. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12620435 135. Vloeberghs V, Verheyen G, Haentjens P, Goossens A, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. How successful is TESE-ICSI in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia? Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2015;30(8):1790–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082482 136. Aksglaede L, Juul A. Testicular function and fertility in men with Klinefelter syndrome: a review. Eur J Endocrinol [Internet]. 2013;168(4):R67--76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23504510 137. Gies I, De Schepper J, Goossens E, Van Saen D, Pennings G, Tournaye H. Spermatogonial stem cell preservation in boys with Klinefelter syndrome: to bank or not to bank, that’s the question. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2012;98(2):284–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22608314 138. Kastrop PM, Weima SM, Van Kooij RJ, Te Velde ER. Comparison between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with high insemination concentration after total fertilization failure in a previous IVF attempt. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1999;14(1):65–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10374096 139. Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Staessen C, De Vos A, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A. Controlled comparison of conventional in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm 154 injection in patients with asthenozoospermia. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1999;14(9):2313–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10469701 140. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Jeffrey R, Warnes GM, Matthews CD. Successful treatment of severe male factor infertility in 100 consecutive cycles using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1994;9(11):2051–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7868673 141. Plachot M, Belaisch-Allart J, Mayenga J-M, Chouraqui A, Tesquier L, Serkine AM. Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2002;17(2):362–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11821279 142. Henkel RR, Schill W-B. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2003;1:108. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14617368 143. Beydola T, Sharma RK, Agarwal A. Sperm preparation and selection techniques. Med Surg Manag male Infertil. 2014;(29):244–51. 144. on Good EGG. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015): Guideline of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. 145. Huang Z, Li J, Wang L, Yan J, Shi Y, Li S. Brief co-incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization techniques. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD009391. 146. Kazem R, Thompson LA, Srikantharajah A, Laing MA, Hamilton MP, Templeton A. Cryopreservation of human oocytes and fertilization by two techniques: in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1995;10(10):2650–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8567786 147. Gook DA, Edgar DH. Human oocyte cryopreservation. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 13(6):591–605. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17846105 148. Harton GL, Magli MC, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmen J, Harper JC, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group--best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2011;26(1):41–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20966459 149. Thornhill AR, DeDie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP, Harper JC, Harton GL, Lavery SA, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium “Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)”. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2005;20(1):35–48. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15539444 150. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: evidence and evolution. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 13(6):515–26. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17630396 151. Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2012;98(6):1395–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22981171 152. van der Westerlaken L, Helmerhorst F, Dieben S, Naaktgeboren N. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2005;83(3):612–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15749489 153. Kinzer DR, Barrett CB, Powers RD. Prognosis for clinical pregnancy and delivery after total fertilization failure during conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2008;90(2):284–8. Available from: 155 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17714711 154. Johnson LNC, Sasson IE, Sammel MD, Dokras A. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2013;100(3):704–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773312 155. Moreno C, Ruiz A, Simón C, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1998;13(8):2126–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9756282 156. Luna M, Bigelow C, Duke M, Ruman J, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, et al. Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved? J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2011;28(10):911–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21792665 157. Kim HH, Bundorf MK, Behr B, McCallum SW. Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2007;88(3):622–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17445809 158. Hwang JL, Lin YH, Tsai YL. In vitro maturation and fertilization of immature oocytes: a comparative study of fertilization techniques. J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2000;17(1):39–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10754782 159. Nagy ZP, Cecile J, Liu J, Loccufier A, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Pregnancy and birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of in vitro matured germinal-vesicle stage oocytes: case report. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1996;65(5):1047–50. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8612833 160. Tucker M, Graham J, Han T, Stillman R, Levy M. Conventional insemination versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2001;358(9293):1645–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11716920 161. Teixeira DM, Barbosa MAP, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA, Raine-Fenning N, Nastri CO, et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD010167. 162. McDowell S, Kroon B, Ford E, Hook Y, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD010461. 163. Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1992;7(5):685–91. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1639990 164. Zeng M, Su S, Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci [Internet]. 2018;33(3):655–66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116610 165. Carney S-K, Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MMW, Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD001894. 166. Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Cimadomo D, Girardi L, Stoppa M, Dovere L, et al. Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management. J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2016;33(10):1279–86. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423665 156 167. Martins WP, Rocha IA, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update [Internet]. 17(4):438–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474527 168. Li D, Yang D-L, An J, Jiao J, Zhou Y-M, Wu Q-J, et al. Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016;6:31228. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503701 169. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2008;23(3):481– 92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18156649 170. De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, et al. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2009;24(12):2988–96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19773223 171. Dumoulin JC, Bras M, Coonen E, Dreesen J, Geraedts JP, Evers JL. Effect of Ca2+/Mg2+- free medium on the biopsy procedure for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and further development of human embryos. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1998;13(1O):2880–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9804249 172. Kahraman S, Bahçe M, Samli H, Imirzalioğlu N, Yakisn K, Cengiz G, et al. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2000;15(9):2003–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10967004 173. Munné S, Cohen J. Unsuitability of multinucleated human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1993;8(7):1120–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8408497 174. Geber S, Bossi R, Lisboa CB, Valle M, Sampaio M. Laser confers less embryo exposure than acid tyrode for embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles: a randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2011;9:58. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21527004 175. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obs Gynecol. 1999;13(3):307–11. 176. Wininger JD, Taylor TH, Orris JJ, Glassner M, Anderson SH. Pregnancy after rebiopsy and vitrification of blastocysts following allele dropout after day 3 biopsy. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2011;95(3):1122.e1--2. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20951376 177. Greco E, Biricik A, Cotarelo RP, Iammarone E, Rubino P, Tesarik J, et al. Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst. Springerplus [Internet]. 2015;4:22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625041 178. Eldar-Geva T, Srebnik N, Altarescu G, Varshaver I, Brooks B, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2014;102(4):1016– 21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25064409 179. De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn [Internet]. 2001;21(9):767–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11559914 180. Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis 157 comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139–55. 181. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2239–46. 182. Cobo A, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Six years’ experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2015;104(6):1426–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26353081 183. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(1):35–58. 184. Shi Q, Xie Y, Wang Y, Li S. Vitrification versus slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-anlaysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017;7(1):8538. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819292 185. Zhou X-H, Zhang D, Shi J, Wu Y-J. Comparison of vitrification and conventional slow freezing for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue with respect to the number of intact primordial follicles: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2016;95(39):e4095. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684791 186. Justice T, Christensen G. Sperm cryopreservation methods. Methods Mol Biol [Internet]. 2013;927:209–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22992915 187. Levron J, Madgar I, Shefi S, Meirow D, Wiser A, Bider D, et al. IVF outcome with cryopreserved testicular sperm. Andrologia [Internet]. 2011;43(1):48–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219382 188. Hovatta O, Foudila T, Siegberg R, Johansson K, von Smitten K, Reima I. Pregnancy resulting from intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa from a frozen-thawed testicular biopsy specimen. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1996;11(11):2472–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8981136 189. Vajta G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. 2015;30(4):325–33. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25639657 190. Youm HS, Choi J-R, Oh D, Rho YH. Survival Rates in Closed and Open Vitrification for Human Mature Oocyte Cryopreservation: A Meta-Analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest [Internet]. 2018;83(3):268–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29131105 191. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):393– 406. 192. Гинтер ЕК, Пузырев ВП. Наследственные болезни. Национальное руководство. Краткое издание. ГЭОТАР-Мед. Москва; 2017. 464 p. 193. Daughtry BL, Chavez SL. Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences. Cell Tissue Res [Internet]. 2016;363(1):201–25. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26590822 194. Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2245– 158 54. 195. De Rycke M, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Coonen E, Moutou C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2017;32(10):1974–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117384 196. PGDIS position statement on chromosome mosaicism and preimplantation aneuploidy testing at the blastocyst stage. Chicago: PGDIS Newsletter, July 19, 2016. 197. Liss J, Chromik I, Szczyglińska J, Jagiełło M, Łukaszuk A, Łukaszuk K. Current methods for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Ginekol Pol [Internet]. 2016;87(7):522–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27504946 198. Kane SC, Willats E, Bezerra Maia E Holanda Moura S, Hyett J, da Silva Costa F. Pre- |