Педагогика. Психология
 Скачать 46.93 Kb.
|
ReferencesMarkaryan E.S. Teoriya kul’tury i sovremennaya nauka [The Theory of Culture and Modern Science]. Moscow, 1983. 284 p. Kagan M.S. Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’: Opyt sistemnogo analiza [Human Activitiy: Experience of Systems Analysis]. Moscow, 1974. 328 p. El’konin D.B. Psikhologiyaigry[The Psychology of Games]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 1999. 360 p. Gal’perin P.Ya. Razvitie issledovaniy po formirovaniyu umstvennykh deystviy [Development of Research on Mental Acts Formation]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka v SSSR [Psychology in the Soviet Union]. Moscow, 1959. Vol. 1, pp. 441–469. Yudin E.G. Sistemnyypodkhodiprintsipdeyatel’nosti(metodologicheskieproblemysovremennoynauki)[Systems Approach and Working Principle (Methodological Issues of Modern Science)]. Moscow, 1978. 391 p. Arstanov M.Zh., Pidkasistyy P.I., Khaydarov Zh.S. Problemno-modul’noeobuchenie.Voprosyteoriiitekhnologiy [Problem-Modular Learning. Theory and Technology]. Alma-Ata, 1980. 193 p. Mozhaev E.L. Igrovaya deyatel’nost’ kak ob”ekt poliparadigmal’nogo issledovaniya [Play Activity as an Object of a Multiparadigmatic Study]. Fizicheskayakul’tura:vospitanie,obrazovanie,trenirovka, 2011, no. 4, pp. 2–6. Khaydarov Zh.S. Teoriyaipraktikaorganizatsiiigrovoydeyatel’nostistudentovvuchebnomprotsesse,didakticheskaya imitatsionnaya igra: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Theory and Practice of Organizing Gaming Activities of Students in the Learning Process, Didactic Simulation Game: Cand. Ped. Sci. Diss.]. Alma-Ata, 1981. 121 p. Karpinskaya R.S. Cheloveki egozhiznedeyatel’nost’[Human and His Life Activity]. Moscow, 1988. Sotsil’nayafilosofiya[Social Philosophy]. Ed. by Lavrinenko V.N. Moscow, 1995. Mozhaev E.L., Bikmukhametov R.K. Igra v strukture chelovecheskoy deyatel’nosti [Games in the Structure of Human Activity]. Teoriyaipraktikafizicheskoykul’tury, 2010, no. 12, pp. 83–88. Mozhaev E.L., Ponomarev N.I. Sotsial’nye funktsii fizicheskoy kul’tury i sporta [Social Functions of Physical Education and Sports]. Moscow, 1974. Mel’nikov Yu.A. Metodika ispol’zovaniya podvizhnykh igr narodov Rossii v fizicheskom vospitanii studencheskoymolodezhi: avtoref. dis. … kand. ped. nauk [The Method of Using Active Games of the Peoples of Russia in the Physical Education of Students: Cand. Ped. Sci. Diss.]. Volgograd, 2011. 23 p. Ezhova L.V. Postanovka i reshenie upravlencheskikh zadach na promyshlennykh predpriyatiyakh metodomdelovykhigr[Management Tasks Formulation and Solution at Industrial Enterprises by Means of Business Games]. St. Petersburg, 2005. 98 p. Gabrusevich S.A., Zorin G.A. Ot delovoy igry – k professional’nomu tvorchestvu [From Business Game to Professional Creativity]. Minsk, 1989. 125 p. Smolkin A.M. Metodyaktivnogoobucheniya[Active Learning Approach]. Moscow, 1991. 176 p. Kratkiypsikhologicheskiyslovar’[Concise Dictionary of Psychology]. Ed. by Petrovskiy A.V., Yaroshev- skiy M.G. 2nd ed. Rostov-on-Don, 1998. 512 p. Verbitskiy A.A. Delovaya igra kak forma kontekstnogo obucheniya studentov i kvaziprofessional’noy deyatel’nosti studentov [Business Game as a Form of Contextual Learning and Simulation of Professional Activity]. VestnikMoskovskogogosudarstvennogogumanitarnogouniversitetaim.M.A.Sholokhova.Ser.:Pedagogikai psikhologiya, 2009, no. 4, pp. 73–84. Alferov A.G. Fizicheskoe vospitanie v gumanitarnykh vuzakh v usloviyakh dialoga kak osnovy obrazovaniyaorientirovannogo na lichnost’ studenta: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Physical Education in Humanities Universities with the Dialogue as a Basis for the Student’s Person-Oriented Education: Cand. Ped. Sci. Diss.]. Volgograd, 2003. 169 p. Verbitskiy A.A. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osobennosti delovoy igry kak formy znakovo-kontekstnogo obu- cheniya [Psycho-Pedagogical Features of Business Game as a Form of Symbolic and Contextual Learning]. Igrovoemodelirovanie:metodologiyaipraktika[Game Modelling: Methods and Practice]. Novosibirsk, 1987. 228 p. Verbitskiy A.A. Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshey shkole: kontekstnyy podkhod [Active Learning in Higher Educa- tion: A Contextual Approach]. Moscow, 1991. 207 p. Dobrynina T.N. Pedagogicheskie usloviya primeneniya interaktivnykh form obucheniya v pedagogicheskomvuze: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Teaching Conditions for the Use of Interactive Forms of Teaching in a Pedagogical Uni- versity: Cand. Ped. Sci. Diss.]. Novosibirsk, 2003. 196 p. Shibalov E.Yu. Sotsial’no-modeliruyushchayaigrakaksredstvosotsial’nogovospitaniyastudentovvuza: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Socio-Modelling Game as a Means of Social Education of University Students: Cand. Ped. Sci. Diss.]. Kostroma, 2012. 187 p. Gadamer H-G. WahrheitundMethode. Tübingen, 1960 (Russ. ed.: Gadamer Kh.-G. Istinaimetod:Osnovy filosofskoygermenevtiki. Moscow, 1988). Jones J. Design Methods. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1981 (Russ. ed.: Dzhons Dzh. Metody proektirovaniya. Moscow, 1986). Ratnikov V.P., Doroshenko V.Yu., Zotova L.I., et al. Struktura chelovecheskoy deyatel’nosti i fenomen igrovoydeyatel’nosti [The Structure of Human Activity and the Phenomenon of Play Activity]. Ed. by Lavrinenko V.N. Mos- cow, 1995. 240 p. Durkin Petr KalistratovichInstitute of Physical Education, Sport and Health, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (Arkhangelsk, Russia) Lebedeva Marina PetrovnaInstitute of Physical Education, Sport and Health, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (Arkhangelsk, Russia) GAMES AS A MEANS OF TEACHING STUDENTSThe paper highlights the complex, contradictory and multifaceted nature of the issue of assessing the role of games in a person’s life. We believe that the game phenomenon requires a comprehensive study applying a variety of scientific theories and concepts, i.e. a multiparadigmatic research. Game is a specific type of activity, a social means by which a person masters the world of the surrounding objects and social relations and assumes the resources of the environment. We look at the concept of activity from the philosophical point of view and single out key types of activity: a) activities of concrete, “technological” nature; b) activities that are invariant with respect to the first type; they ensure the efficiency of actions in various spheres of human life. The article presents the concept of natural and man-made games. We recommend using games for the development of research skills and point out that games and research activity have freedom of imagination in common. The paper lists the following functions of games being part of the university education: educational, socially orienting, organizational, stimulating, communicative, remedial, reflective, teaching, developing, and stimulating the person’s self-development. One of the advantages of games is that they offer plenty of opportunities to evaluate, develop, form and correct the general and professional skills of specialists-to-be. In addition, we provide insights into the importance of teaching and business games as well as identify the teaching conditions for the use of business games at universities. Separately the paper examines the role and importance of sports games in the moral education of students. Keywords: essence of games, game as a human activity, importance of games for teaching students,sportsgames,businessgame. Контактнаяинформация: Дуркин Пётр Калистратович адрес:163002, г. Архангельск, Наб. Северной Двины, д. 17; e-mail: durkin1@yandex.ru Лебедева Марина Петровна адрес:163002, г. Архангельск, Наб. Северной Двины, д. 17; e-mail:marinaleb29rus@yandex.ru Рецензент – Буторина Т.С., доктор педагогических наук, профессор, заведующая кафедрой педагогики, психологии и профессионального обучения института педагогики и психологии, директор научно-образователь- ного центра «Ломоносовский институт» Северного (Арктического) федерального университета имени М.В. Ло- моносова |