Английский. английский для ИТ 1. Методическое пособие по совершенствованию навыков чтения и говорения на английском языке для студентов фксиС и фитиУ
 Скачать 0.77 Mb.
|
|
Computer Crime It doesn’t take any special digital expertise to mastermind some computer crimes. Setting fire to a computer doesn’t require the same finesse as writing a stealthy virus, but both can have the same disastrous effect on data. “Old-fashioned” crimes, such as arson, that take a high-tech twist because they involve a computer can be prosecuted under traditional laws. Traditional laws do not, however, cover the range of possibilities for computer crimes. Suppose a person unlawfully enters a computer facility and steals backup tapes. That person might be prosecuted for breaking and entering. But would common breaking and entering laws apply to a person who uses an off-site terminal to “enter” a computer system without authorization? And what if a person copies a data file without authorization? Has that file really been “stolen” if the original remains on the computer? Many countries have computer crime laws that specifically define computer data and software as personal property. These laws also define as crimes the unauthorized access, use, modification, or disabling of a computer system or data. But laws don’t necessarily stop criminals. If they did, we wouldn’t have to deal with malicious code and intrusions. A 1995 high-profile case involved a computer hacker named Kevin Mitnick, who was accused of breaking into dozens of corporate, university, government, and personal computers. Although vilified in the media, Mitnick had the support of many hackers and other people who believed that the prosecution grossly exaggerated the extent of his crimes. Nonetheless, Mitnick was sentenced to 46 months in prison and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $4,125 during his three-year period of supervised release. The prosecution was horrified by such a paltry sum – an amount that was much less than its request for $1,5 million in restitution. Forbes reporter Adam L. Penenberg took issue with the 46-month sentence imposed by Judge Marianne Pfaelzer and wrote, “This in a country where the average prison term for manslaughter is three years. Mitnick’s crimes were curiously innocuous. He broke into corporate computers, but no evidence indicates that he destroyeddata. Or sold anything he copied. Yes, he pilfered software — but in doing so left it behind. This world of bits is a strange one, in which you can take something and still leave it for its rightful owner. The theft laws designed for payroll sacks and motor vehicles just don’t apply to a hacker.” The U.S. Patriot Act and the Cyber-Security Enhancement Act carry even stiffer penalties – anywhere from 10 years to life in prison. A CNET reporter questions the harshness of such penalties: “What bothers me most is that here in the United States, rapists serve, on average, 10 years in prison. Yet if, instead of assaulting another human being, that same person had released a virus on the Net, the criminal would get the same or an even harsher sentence.” Law makers hope that stiff penalties will deter cyber criminals. U. S. Attorney John McKay is quoted as saying, “Let there be no mistake about it, cyber-hacking is a crime. It harms persons, it harms individuals, it harms businesses. These cases illustrate our culture's ambivalent attitude toward computer hackers. On the one hand, they are viewed as evil cyberterrorists who are set on destroying the glue that binds together the Information Age. From this perspective, hackers are criminals who must be hunted down, forced to make restitution for damages, and prevented from creating further havoc. From another perspective, hackers are viewed more as Casper the Friendly Ghost in cur complex cybermachines – as moderately bothersome entities whose pranks are tolerated by the computer community, along with software bugs. Seen from this perspective, a hacker's pranks are part of the normal course of study that leads to the highest echelons of computer expertise. What do you think? Should a computer virus distribution sentence carry the same penalty as manslaughter? Should it be a crime to steal a copy of computer data while leaving the original data in place and unaltered? Should hackers be sent to jail if they cannot pay restitution to companies and individuals who lost money as the result of a prank? Do you think that a hacker would make a good consultant on computer security? Final test. Do the tasks in the following test. 1. A (n) ___ is a copy of one or more files that has been made in case the original files become damaged. 2. The Windows ___ is an important group of files that the Windows operating system uses to store configuration information about all the devices and software installed on a computer system. 3. The main directory of a disk is referred to as the ___ directory. 4. The main hard disk drive on a PC is often referred to as “drive C”. (True/False) 5. A filename extension is usually related to a file ___, which is the arrangement of data in a file and the coding scheme used to represent the data. 6. Antivirus software is 100% reliable when it comes to protecting your computer from viruses. (True/False) 7. A file specification or path typically includes all of the following information EXCEPT ___. a) the file author b) the file name c) the file extension d) the drive letter 8. ___ software is a set of utility programs that looks for and eradicates viruses, worms, and Trojan horses. 9. File-naming ___ are a set of rules for naming files. 10. The easiest way to convert a file from one format to another is to find an application program that works with both file formats. (True/False) 11. Deleting a file’s icon from a directory does not necessarily remove the data from the disk. (True/False) 12. A computer ___ is a set of program instructions that attaches itself to a file, reproduces itself, and spreads to other files. 13. A root directory typically contains smaller ___, often depicted as folders in graphical user interfaces. 14. A (n) ___ is a computer program that seems to perform one function while actually doing something else. 15. A virus can be spread if people distribute infected files by ___. a) exchanging disks or CDs b) sending e-mail attachments c) downloading software from the Web d) all of the above 16. You should update your antivirus software regularly. (True/False) 17. Bot-infected computers linked together into a network is called a(n) ___. 18. A virus ___ is a section of the virus program that can be used to identify a known virus. 19. Computer virus trigger events are often tied to a specific date. (True/False) 20. The file ___ helps you keep track of the most current version of your file when you have saved several versions. Projects. Choose and perform one of the projects given. 1. Select one of the following statements and argue for or against it: - People have the “right” to hone their computing skills by breaking into computers. - A person who creates a virus is perfectly justified in releasing it if the purpose is to make everyone aware of these security breaches. - Computer crimes are no different from other crimes, and computer criminals should be held responsible for the damage they cause. 2. Suppose you are a reporter for a local television station. Your assignment is to create a 90-second story about new emerged virus for your local TV news show. The basic objectives of the story are (1) to inform about the ways of spreading this virus and attributes that enable a person to find out presence of this particular virus and (2) to provide a set of concrete steps that a person could take to minimize the consequences for his computer and get rid of the virus. Of course, the network wants the story to be interesting, so you have to include a human-interest angle. Write the script for the story and include notes about the visuals that will appear. С в. план 2009, поз. Учебное издание Методическое пособие по совершенствованию навыков чтения и говорения на английском языке для студентов ФКСиС и ФИТиУ Составители: Наталия Григорьевна Касперович, Людмила Станиславовна Карпик, Марина Владимировна Ладыженко, Ольга Владимировна Туник, Регина Константиновна Образцова, Елена Николаевна Щекотович. Корректор Е.Н. Батурчик Подписано в печать Формат 60х84 1/16 Бумага Печать Усл.печ.л. Уч. – изд. л. Тираж экз. Заказ Издатель и полиграфическое исполнение: Учреждение образования “Белорусский государственный университет информатики и радиоэлектроники” Лицензия на осуществление издательской деятельности № 02330/0056964 от 01.04.2004 Лицензия на осуществление полиграфической деятельности № 02330/0133108 от 03.04.2004 220013, Минск, П.Бровки, 6 |