Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram
 Скачать 0.88 Mb.
|
|
80:1343–5. 18. Zimetbaum PJ, Krishnan S, Gold A, et al. Usefulness of ST-segment elevation in lead III exceeding that of lead II for identifying the location of the totally occluded coronary artery in inferior wall myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:918 –9. 19. Braat SH, Brugada P, de Zwaan C, et al. Value of electrocardiogram in diagnosing right ventricular involvement in patients with an acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1983;49:368 –72. 20. Zalenski RJ, Rydman RJ, Sloan EP, et al. Value of posterior and right ventricular leads in comparison to the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in evaluation of ST-segment elevation in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1579–85. 21. Correale E, Battista R, Martone A, et al. Electrocardiographic patterns in acute inferior myocardial infarction with and without right ventricular involvement: classification, diagnostic and prognostic value, masking effect. Clin Cardiol. 1999;22:37– 44. 22. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1376]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:671–719. 23. Perloff JK. The recognition of strictly posterior myocardial infarction by conventional scalar electrocardiography. Circulation. 1964;30:706 –18. 24. Horan LG, Flowers NC, Johnson JC. Significance of the diagnostic Q wave of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1971;43:428 –36. 25. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al., for the American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–42. 26. Bayés de Luna A, Wagner G, Birnbaum Y, et al., for the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiography. A new terminology for left ventricular walls and location of myocardial infarcts that present Q wave based on the standard of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a statement for healthcare professionals from a committee appointed by the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiography. Circulation. 2006;114:1755– 60. 27. Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes L, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography 69 diagnostic statement list: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1128 –35. 28. Bairey CN, Shah PK, Lew AS, Hulse S. Electrocardiographic differentiation of occlusion of the left circumflex versus the right coronary artery as a cause of inferior acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 60:456–69. 29. Gorgels AP, Vos MA, Mulleneers R, et al. Value of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:999 –1003. 30. De Zwaan C, Bär FW, Gorgels AP, Wellens HJ. Unstable angina: are we able to recognize high-risk patients? Chest. 1997;112:244 –50. 31. De Zwaan C, Bär FW, Wellens HJ. Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1982;103:730–6. 32. Simon K, Hackett D, Szelier A, et al. The natural history of postischemic T-wave inversion: a predictor of poor short-term prognosis? Coron Artery Dis. 1994;5:937– 42. 33. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al., for the GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 1996;334:931]. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:481–7. 34. Shlipak MG, Lyons WL, Go AS, et al. Should the electrocardiogram be used to guide therapy for patients with left bundle-branch block and suspected myocardial infarction? JAMA. 1999;281:714 –9. 35. Wong CK, French JK, Aylward PE, et al; HERO-2 Investigators. Patients with prolonged ischemic chest pain and presumed-new left bundle branch block have heterogeneous outcomes depending on the presence of ST-segment changes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:29 –38. 36. Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, et al. The electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system. Circulation. 1960;21: 1160–75. 37. Pahlm US, Chaitman BR, Rautaharju PM, et al. Comparison of the various electrocardiographic scoring codes for estimating anatomically documented sizes and single and multiple infarcts of the left ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:809 –15. 38. Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, et al. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation. 1970;41:899 –912. 39. Startt-Selvester RH, Wagner GS, Ideker RE. Myocardial infarction. In: Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDV, editors. Comprehensive Electrocardiology: Theory and Practice in Health Disease. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1989:565– 629. 40. Hindman NB, Schocken DD, Widmann M, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size, V: specificity and method of application of the complete system. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55: 1485–90. |