Главная страница
Навигация по странице:

  • Для заметок 90 Пригодность аналитических методов для конкретного применения Руководство для лабораторий

    		•

    Пригодность аналитических методик. Руководство для лабораторий по валидации методов и смежным вопросам Под редакцией Б. Магнуссона и У. Эрнемарка


    Скачать 1.02 Mb.
    НазваниеРуководство для лабораторий по валидации методов и смежным вопросам Под редакцией Б. Магнуссона и У. Эрнемарка
    АнкорПригодность аналитических методик
    Дата29.11.2020
    Размер1.02 Mb.
    Формат файлаpdf
    Имя файла5ebbe78b99cd1.pdf
    ТипРуководство
    #155102
    страница9 из 9
    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9
    67, 1699.
    50. L. A. Currie, Detection in analytical chemistry – Importance, theory, and practice, ACS
    Symposium Series 361, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1988.
    51. Analytical Methods Committee, Recommendations for the definition, estimation and use of the detection limit, Analyst, 1987, 112, 199.
    52. A. Shrivastava, V. B. Gupta, Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods, Chronicles of Young Scientists, 2011, 2(1), 21.
    53. United States Pharmacopeia, Validation of compendial methods, 26th revision, National
    Formulary, 21st ed. Rockville, MD: The United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc., 2003.
    54. Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 (28 March 2007) laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs, Off. J. EU, L 88/29, 29 March 2007.
    55. M. Valcarcel, S. Cardenas, D. Barcelo et al., Metrology of qualitative chemical analysis, report EUR 20605 EN, European Commission, 2002, ISBN 92-894-5194-7.
    56. H. Sahai, R. P. Singh, The use of R2 as a measure of goodness of fit: An overview,
    Virginia Journal of Science, 1989, 40(1), 5.
    57. Analytical Methods Committee, Uses (proper and improper) of correlation coefficients,
    Analyst, 1988, 113, 1469.
    58. ISO 11732:2005 Water quality – Determination of ammonium nitrogen – Method by flow analysis (CFA and FIA) and spectrometric detection, ISO Geneva.
    59. A. Menditto, M. Patriarca, B. Magnusson, Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision, Accred. Qual. Assur., 2007, 12, 45.
    60. D. T. Burns, K. Danzer, A. Townshend, Use of the terms “recovery” and “apparent recovery” in analytical procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002), Pure Appl. Chem., 2002,
    74(11), 2201.

    87 61. S. L. R. Ellison, B. King, M. Rosslein, M. Salit, A. Williams (eds.), Eurachem/CITAC
    Guide Traceability in chemical measurement. A guide to achieving comparable results in chemical measurement, 1st ed, Eurachem, 2003, www.eurachem.org.
    62. P. De Bievre, R. Dybkaer, A. Fajgelj, D. Brynn Hibbert, Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: Concepts and implementation (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure
    Appl. Chem., 2011, 83(10), 1873
    *
    63. AMC technical brief No. 21, Sept. 2008, M. Thompson (ed.), The estimation and use of recovery factors, www.rsc.org.
    64. ISO Guide 33:2000 Uses of certified reference materials, ISO Geneva.
    65. T. Linsinger, Application note 1, Rev. 3 2010. Comparison of a measurement result with the certified value, www.erm-crm.org.
    66. B. Magnusson, T. Naykki, H. Hovind, M. Krysell, Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, Nordtest Report TR 537 (ed. 3.1) 2012, www.nordtest.info.
    67. ISO 21748:2010 Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation, ISO Geneva.
    68. Eurolab, Measurement uncertainty revisited: Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation,
    Technical report No. 1/2007, www.eurolab.org.
    68. Eurolab, Measurement uncertainty revisited: Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation, Technical report No. 1/2007, www.eurolab.org.
    69. S. L. R. Ellison, A. Williams, Measurement uncertainty: the key to the use of recovery factors? From “The use of recovery factors in trace analysis”, M. Parkany (ed.), RSC, Cambridge,
    1996.
    70. V. J. Barwick, S. L. R. Ellison, Measurement uncertainty: approaches to the evaluation of uncertainties associated with recovery, Analyst, 1999, 124, 981.
    71. S. L. R. Ellison, V. J. Barwick, Estimating measurement uncertainty: Reconciliation using a cause and effect approach, Accred. Qual. Assur., 1998, 3, 101-105.
    72. G. E. O’Donnell, D. B. Hibbert, Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty, Analyst, 2005, 130, 721.
    73. B. Magnusson, S. L. R. Ellison, Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2008, 390, 201.
    *
    Перевод на руский язык: Поль Де Бивр, Рене Дибкер, Алеш Файгель, Д. Бринн Гибберт, Метрологическая прослеживаемость результатов измерений в химии: понятия и реализация (Технический отчет IUPAC), www.metrology.kiev.ua/mizhnarodna-metrologiya/pereklad-mizhnarodnikh-dokumentiv (прим. переводчика)

    88 74. W. J. Youden, E. H. Steiner, Statistical Manual of the AOAC, AOAC International,
    1975, ISBN 0-935584-15-3.
    75. Harmonised guidelines for internal quality control in analytical chemistry laboratories,
    (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem., 1995, 67(4), 649.
    76. H. Hovind, B. Magnusson, M. Krysell, U. Lund, and I. Makinen, Internal quality control – Handbook for chemical laboratories, Nordtest technical report 569, 4th ed., 2011, www.nordtest.info.
    77. ISO 7870 Control charts – Parts 1-5, ISO Geneva.
    78. AMC technical brief No. 9, Feb. 2002, M. Thompson (ed.), A simple fitness-for-purpose control chart based on duplicate results obtained from routine test materials, www.rsc.org.
    79. ISO/IEC 17011:2004 Conformity assessment – General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, ISO Geneva.
    80. ISO/IEC 17043:2010 Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing, ISO Geneva.
    81. I. Mann, B. Brookman (eds.), Eurachem Guide: Selection, use and interpretation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes by laboratories, 2nd ed., Eurachem, 2011, www.eurachem.org.
    82. EA-4/18 TA, Guidance on the level and frequency of proficiency testing participation,
    European co-operation for Accreditation, 2010, www.european-accreditation.org.
    83. ISO 78-2:1999 Chemistry – Layouts for standards - Part 2: Methods of chemical analysis, ISO Geneva.
    84. S.L.R. Ellison, A. Williams (eds.), Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Use of uncertainty information in compliance assessment, Eurachem, 2007, www.eurachem.org.
    85. R. R. Galen, S. R. Gambino, Beyond normality: The predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnoses, John Wiley and Sons, 1975, ISBN 978-0471290476.
    86. M. S. Pepe, The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction,
    Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003, ISBN 978-0-19-850984-4.
    87. X-H. Zhou, N.A. Obuchowski, D.K. McСlish, Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine, 2nd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2011, ISBN 978-0-470-18314-4.

    89
    Для заметок

    90
    Пригодность аналитических методов
    для конкретного применения
    Руководство для лабораторий
    по валидации методов и смежным вопросам
    Формат 6084/8
    Усл. печ. л. 11.16
    Уч.-изд. л. 7.22
    Бумага офсетная. Гарнитура Times
    Подписано в печать 23.02.2016
    Тираж 95 экз.
    Издано ООО "Юрка Любченка"
    Свидетельство о внесении в Государственный реестр издателей, изготовителей и распространителей издательской продукции серии ДК № 4685 от 6.03.2014 e-mail – u19-07@ukr.net, тел. 098-444-06-68 г. Киев, ул. Дегтяревская, 25а

    1
    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

    написать администратору сайта