Главная страница

Типология лексических систем и лексико-семантических универсалий. Монография2004. Министерство общего и профессионального образования российской федерации башкирский государственный университет


Скачать 1.34 Mb.
НазваниеМинистерство общего и профессионального образования российской федерации башкирский государственный университет
АнкорТипология лексических систем и лексико-семантических универсалий
Дата21.01.2022
Размер1.34 Mb.
Формат файлаdoc
Имя файлаМонография2004.doc
ТипМонография
#337782
страница20 из 20
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20

Arens H. Aristotle's theory of language and tradition // Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science, 3: studies in the history of linguistics. Amsterdam, 1984, 29.

  • Bendix E. Componential analysis of general vocabulary: the semantic structure of a set of verbs in English, Hindi and Japanese // International journal of American linguistics, 1966, 32, 2: 1–190.

  • Berlin B., Kay P. Basic color terms, their universality and evolution. – Berkley, 1969.

  • Berlin В., Bredlove D.E., Raven Р.H. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology // American anthropologist, 1973, 75: 214–242.

  • Bickerton D. Language and species. – Chicago, 1990.

  • Bolinger D. Language the loaded weapon. – N.Y., 1980.

  • Carrol J. Linguistic relativity, contrastive linguistics and language learning // Studies in contrastive linguistics and error analysis. Heidelberg, 1972, 2: 7–30.

  • Chomsky N. Language problems of knowledge (the Managua lectures). – London, 1988.

  • Clark E.V. & Clark H.H. Universals, relativity and language processing // Universals of human language. Stanford, 1978, 1: 225–277.

  • Comrie B. Linguistic typology // Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Linguistic theory: Foundations. Cambridge, 1988, 1: 447–461.

  • Comrie В. Language universals and linguistic typology: syntax and morphology. – Oxford, 1981.

  • Comrie В. Holistic versus partial typologies // Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of linguists. Berlin, 1990, 1: 139–148.

  • Coseriu E. Les universeaux linguistiques (et les autres) // Proceedings of the llth International Congress of linguists. Bologna, 1974, 1: 47–73.

  • Coseriu E. Introduction. Der Sinn der Sprachtypologie // TCLC 20, 1980: 157–170.

  • Cruse D. Lexical semantics. – Cambridge, 1986.

  • Danchin A. Biological foundations of language: a comment on N. Chomsky's approach to syntactical structures // Noam Chomsky. Consensus and controversy. N.Y., 1987: 29–39.

  • Devitt M., Sterelny K. Language and reality. An introduction to the philosophy of language. – Cambridge, 1987.

  • Dezsö L. Continuum and typology // Language invariants and mental operations (International interdisciplinary conference, Cologne, 1983). Tübingen, 1985: 88–96.

  • Ducháček O. Quelques observations sur les structures sémantiques // Folia linguistica, 1975, 7, 3/4: 245–252.

  • Eckman F.R. Universals, typologies and interlanguage // Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, 1987: 79–105.

  • Eco U. The search for the perfect language. – Oxford, 1995.

  • Fodor J.A. Psychosemantics: the problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. – Cambridge, 1988.

  • Fodor J.A. The language of thought. – Cambridge, 1980.

  • Frawley W. Some semantic lessons for lexicographers // Language and civilization: a concerted profusion of essays and studies in honour of Otto Heitsch. Frankfurt-am-Main, 1992, 2: 232–241.

  • Gabelentz G. van der. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig, 1901.

  • Gass S., Ard J. Second language acquisition and the ontology of language universals // Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam, 1987: 33–68.

  • Gipper H., Schwartz H. Bibliographisches Handbuch zur Sprachinhaltsforschung // Schriften zur Sprachinhaltsforschung in alphabetischer Folge nach Verfassen mit Besprechungen und Inhaltshinweisen. Köln,1962, 1.

  • Gopnik A. Conceptual and semantic change in scientists and children: why there are no semantic universals // Explorations for language universals. N.Y., 1984: 163–179:

  • Greenberg J.H. Diachrony, synchrony and language universals // Universals of human language: method and theory. Stanford, 1978, 1: 63–91.

  • Greenberg J.H. Language typology: a historical and analytical overview. – The Hague, 1974.

  • Greenberg J.H. Language universals. – The Hague, 1966.

  • Greenberg J.H. The nature and uses of linguistic typologies // International journal of American linguistics, 1957, 23, 2: 68–77.

  • Greenberg J.H. Typology and cross-linguistic generalizations // Universals of human language: method and theory. Stanford, 1978, 1: 34–59.

  • Hagège C. La structure des langues. – Paris, 1982.

  • Harris R. The language myth. – Worcester, 1981.

  • Hawkins J.A. A comparative study of English and German. – London, 1980.

  • Heatherington M.E. How language works. – Cambridge, 1980.

  • Hill J.H. Language, culture and world view // Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey: Language – the socio-cultural context. – Cambridge, 1988, 4: 14–36.

  • Hjelmslev L. Language. An abstraction. – London, 1970.

  • Hughes G. Half angels and half bird: binary oppositions in the categorization of women // Language and civilization: a concerted profusion of essays and studies in honour of Otto Hietsch. Frankfurt-am-Main, 1992, 2: 398–418.

  • Hurvich G. Color vision. – Sunderland, 1981.

  • Jackendoff R. Semantics and cognition. – London, 1986.

  • Jakobson R. On translation. – Cambridge, 1959.

  • Jakobson R. Typological studies and their contribution to historical comparative linguistics // R. Jakobson. On language. Cambridge, 1990: 143–151.

  • James C. Contrastive analysis. – Harlow, 1980.

  • Jespersen O. Efficiency and linguistic change. – Copenhagen, 1941.

  • Jespersen O. Language, its nature, development and origin. – London, 1922.

  • Jespersen O. Mankind, nation and individual from a linguistic point of view. – Oslo, 1925.

  • John-Steiner V. Cognitive pluralism: a Whorfian analysis // The influence of language on culture and thought: essays in honour of J.A. Fishman's 65th birthday. Berlin, 1991: 61–74.

  • Joseph J.E. Natural grammar, arbitrary lexicon: an enduring parallel m the history of linguistic thought // Language and communication – аn interdisciplinary journal, 1995, 15, 3: 213–225.

  • Katz J. Semantic theory. – N.Y., 1972.

  • Kay R., Kempton W. What is the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis // American anthropologist, 1984, 86, 1: 65–79.

  • Keefer M. On functional explanations of language change, universals and rules // Functional explanations in linguistics: Belgian journal of linguistics. 1986, 1: 53–66.

  • Lakoff G. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. – Chicago, 1987.

  • Langacker R.W. Language and its structure. – N.Y., 1973.

  • Lehman Ch. Lexically based typology // Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of linguists (Berlin, 1987). Berlin, 1990, 2: 2380–2395.

  • Lehman Ch. Studies in general linguistics // AKUP (Arbeiten des Kölner Universalienprojekts), 1988, 71.

  • Lehman W. Language. An introduction. – N.Y., 1982.

  • Lyons J. Natural language and universal grammar: essays in linguistic theory. – Cambridge, 1991, 1.

  • Macnamara J. Linguistic relativity revisited // The influence of language on culture and thought: essays in honour of J.A. Fishman's 65th birthday. Berlin, 1991: 45–60.

  • Makkai A. Idiomaticity as a language universal // Universals of human language: word structure. Stanford, 1978, 3: 403–448.

  • Markova I. Paradigms, thought and language. – Chichester, 1982.

  • Martinet A. A functional view of language. – Oxford, 1962.

  • Mathio M. An approach to the cognitive study of language. – The Hague, 1968.

  • McCarthy M. Vocabulary. – Oxford, 1990.

  • Meillet A. Linguistique historique et linguistique generale. – Paris, 1948.

  • Milewski T. Introduction to the study of language. – Mouton, 1973.

  • Müller G. Towards a semantic typology of languages // Meaning and grammar. 1992.

  • Nedjalkov V.P., Litvinov V.D. The St. Petersburg / Leningrad typology group // Approaches to language typology. Oxford, 1995: 215–271.

  • Nickols J. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar // Language, 1986, 62: 56–119.

  • Osgood Ch. Explorations in semantic space // Focus on meaning, 1. The Hague, 1979.

  • Osgood Ch. The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies // Language, meaning and culture. The selected papers of C.E. Osgood. N.Y., 1990: 203–234.

  • Penn J. Linguistic relativity versus innate ideas. – The Hague, 1972.

  • Plank F. Hypology, typology: the Gabelentz puzzle // Folia Linguistica, 1991, 25: 421–458.

  • Ramat P. Typological comparison: towards a historical perspective // Approaches to language typology. Oxford, 1995: 27–48.

  • Rapoport A. Semantics. – N.Y., 1975.

  • Raybeck D., Harmann D. Antonymy and semantic relations: the case for a linguistic universal // Cross-cultural research, 1996, 30, 2: 154–183.

  • Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories // Journal of experimental psychology: Generals, 1975, 104: 192–233.

  • Rosch E. Natural categories // Cognitive psychology. 1973, 4: 328–350.

  • Rosch E. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories // Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. N.Y., 1973: 111–144.

  • Saugstad P. A theory of language and understanding. – Oslo, 1980.

  • Schlegel F. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indien. – Heidelberg, 1808.

  • Schlesinger M. The wax and wane of Whorfian views // The influence of language on culture and thought: essays in honour of J.A. Fishman's 65th birthday. Berlin, 1991: 7–44.

  • Searle J.K. The background of meaning // Speech act theory and pragmatics. Dordrecht, 1980.

  • Seiler H.J. Apprehension: language, object and order: the universal dimension of apprehension. – Tübingen, 1986, 3.

  • Seiler H.J. Cognitive-conceptual structure and linguistic encoding: language universals and typology in the UNITYP framework // Approaches to language typology. Oxford, 1995: 273–325.

  • Sgall P. Prague school typology // Approaches to language typology. Oxford, 1995: 49–84.

  • Shibatani M., Bynon Th. Approaches to language typology: a conspectus // Approaches to language typology. Oxford, 1995: 1–25.

  • Skalička V. <рецензия на книгу>: Robins J.H. General linguistics: an introductory survey. – London, 1964 // Linguistics, 1966, 24: 121–123.

  • Skalička V. Wortschatz und Typologie // Asian and African studies. Bratislava, 1965, 1.

  • Smith N. Universals and typology // Noam Chomsky. Consensus and controversy. N.Y., 1987: 57–66.

  • Taylor J.R. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. – Oxford, 1989.

  • Ullmann S. Language and style. – N.Y., 1964.

  • Ullmann S. Précis de sémantique française. – Berne, 1952.

  • Ungerer F., Schmid H.J. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. – London, 1996.

  • Wallace A. The problem of the psychological validity of componential analysis // American anthropologist, 1965, 67, 5: 229–236.

  • Wierzbicka A. Lexicography and conceptual analysis. – Ann Arbor, 1985.

  • Wierzbicka A. Lingua Mentalis. The semantics of natural language. – Sydney, 1980.

  • Wissler К. Man and culture. – N.Y., 1923.

  • Witkowski S., Brown C. Climate, clothing and body-part nomenclature // Ethnology, 1985, 24, 3: 197–214.

  • 149 150
    1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20


    написать администратору сайта