Консоциация. Высшая школа экономики

• Название: Высшая школа экономики
• Анкор: Консоциация
• Дата: 24.04.2021
• Размер: 100.07 Kb.
• Имя файла: jukova_aa_konsociativnye-elementy-indiyskoy-gosudarstvennoy-sist.docx
• Тип: Реферат; #198328
• страница: 11 из 11

Приложения

Приложение 1

Точки вето при принятии решений в парламенте

Приложение 2

Вето игроки в штате Джамму и Кашмир

1^ B. Barry (1975-A). "The Consociational Model and Its Dangers." In European Journal of Political Research 3 (4, 1975), 393-412.

2^ Lijphart, The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict management and Democracy, ed. Andrew Reynolds// Oxford University Press, 2002, 37-54

3^ Luc Huyse, Passiviteit, pacifacatie en verzuiling in de Belgische politiek: een sociologische studie (Antwerp: Standaard Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij, 1970

4^ Rodney Stiefbold, Segmented Pluralism, Consociational Democracy and Austrian Electoral Politics: Michigan University, 1973

5^ Daadler, “The Consociational Democracy Theme”, World Politics 26 (1974): 604-621; Andre Kaiser “Types of Democracy: From Classical to New Institutionalism”, Journal of Theoretical Politics 9 (1997): 419-444

6^ Lorwin, “Segmented pluralism” p. 141-145

7^ Ibid

8^ Lorwin “Segmented Pluralism”, 144

9^ Lijphart “Typologies of Democratic Systems”, Comparative Politics Studies 1(1968): 3-44; Lehmbruch, “Consociational Democracy in the International System”, 381

10^ Daadler, “On Building Consociational Nations”, 121-122

11^ В своей работе «Сравнительные политические системы» Алмонд представил четыре типа систем: Англо-Американскую, Континентально-Европейскую, преиндустриальную и тоталитарную. Лейпхарт был не согласен, что данные типы применимы к небольшим европейским государствам, поэтому и предложил свою типологию.

12^ Lijphart, “Typologies of Democratic Systems”.

13^ Lijphart, “Democracies in Plural Societies”.

14^ Lijphart, “Typologies of Democratic Systems”, 22-23

15^ Lijphart, “Democracies in Plural Societies”.

16^ Ibid

17^ Riker W.H. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1962, P.32-33

18^ Almond G.A. Comparative Political Systems//Journal of Politics 18 № 3(August 1956). P. 398-399

19^ Calhoun J.C. A Disquisition on Government/ Gordon Post C. (ed.) New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1953. P. 28

20^ Ibid, P.37-38

21^ Steiner J. The Principle of Majority and Proportionality // British Journal of Political Science 1. № 1(January 1971). P.63

22^ Lijphart, A. (1985). Power-sharing in South Africa. 1st ed. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, p. 119-128

23^ Dahl, On Democracy, New Haven and London: Yale Press University, 1998, p 192

24^ Brendan O’Leary, “The Limits to Coercive Consociationalism in Northern Ireland”, Political Studies 37, 1989, p 562-588

25^ Van der Berghe, Ethnic Phenomenon, p 187

26^ Barry, B. (1975). The Consociational Model And Its Dangers. European Journal of Political Research, 3(4), pp.393-412.

27^ Ibid.

28^ Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. 1st ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

29^ Van der Berghe, Ethnic Phenomenon, 185-193

30^ Lijphart, A (1996) ‘The puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation’ in American Political Science Review Vol. 90, No. 2. University of California.

31^ Sartori, G. (2016). Parties and party systems. 1st ed. [Place of publication not identified]: Ecpr Press.

32^ Kothari, Rajni, Democratic Policy and Social Change in India: Crisis and Opportunities, Bombay: Allied, 1976

33^ Авторский перевод термина «self-rule»

34^ Manifesto 2014. J&K Peoples Democratic Party [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://jkpdp.org/manifesto-2014/

35^ The Common Minimum Programme of Jammu and Kashmir Government: Understanding on Key Issues [Электронный ресурс]: URL: http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/the-common-minimum-programme-of-jammu-and-kashmir-government-understanding-on-key-issues-743414

36^ The Constitution of India. Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi, 2007. Режим доступа: http://india.gov.in/my-government/constitution-india/constitution-india-full-text

37^ Ibid

38^ Ibid

39^ Tsebelis G. Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism //British journal of political science. Cambridge, 1995, №25. P.289-326

40^ Immergut, E. (n.d.). Institutions, veto points, and policy results, p 132

41^ Summer Institution of Linguistic, URL: ttps://www.sil.org

42^ Census 2001, Ministry of Home Affairs, India, URL: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/India_at_glance/religion.aspx

43^ Miller, N. (2017). Economic Diversity of India | Indias by Class. [online] Learning India. URL: http://learningindia.in/indias-by-class/ [Accessed 21 May 2017].

44^ South Asia @ LSE. (2017). Why is economic growth across Indian states uneven?. [online] Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2013/02/18/why-is-economic-growth-across-indian-states-uneven/ [Accessed 21 May 2017].