32018консультативнаяпсихологияи психотерапия
 Скачать 3.04 Mb.
|
|
For citation: Klimanova S.G., Trusova A.V., Kiselev A.S., Berntsev V.A., D.I. Gromyko, Ilyuk R.D., Kru- pitsky E.M. Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Russian Version of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 80—104. doi: 10.17759/cpp.2018260305. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.) Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2018. Т. 26. № 3 Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3 100 D.I. GROMYKO*****, V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, St. Petersburg, Russia, dmgrom@list.ru R.D. ILYUK******, V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, St. Petersburg, Russia, ruslan.iluk@mail.ru E.M. KRUPITSKY*******, V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology; Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University; St. Petersburg, Russia, kruenator@gmail.com The article presents the results of adaptation of the Russian version of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES, ver. 8A, 8D). For the purpose of the study 322 patients were recruited, who were undergoing inpatient and/or outpatient treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (N=201) or Polysubstance Use Disorder (N=121) at the Department of Addictions at V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology (St. Petersburg, Russia). The study procedure in- cluded translation, patients’ assessment, and statistical analysis of the scale’s factor struc- ture as well as internal consistency. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis did not support the three-factor structure of the scale but identified one factor, which reflects patients’ general readiness for change regarding their substance use. Patients’ gender, age, and clinical characteristics didn’t significantly affect the scale’s psychometric properties. Keywords: SOCRATES, motivation, readiness for change, stages of readiness for change, validity, substance use disorder, alcohol use disorder. REFERENCES 1. Ilyuk R.D., Gromyko D.I., Berno-Bellekur I.V. Issledovanie vliyaniya kliniko- psikhologicheskikh faktorov na motivatsiyu k otkazu ot potrebleniya psikhoaktivnykh ***** Gromyko Dmitry Ivanovich, Ph.D., Researcher, Department of Addictions, V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, St. Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: dmgrom@list.ru ****** Ilyuk Ruslan Dmitrievich, Ph.D., Chief, Department of Addictive Pathology, V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, St. Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: ruslan.iluk@mail.ru ******* Krupitsky Evgeny Mikhailovich, Doctor in Medicine, Professor, Chief, Lab- oratory of Clinical Psychopharmacology of Addictions, St. Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University; Chief, Department of Addictions, V.M. Bekhterev National Re- search Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, St. Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: kruenator@gmail.com 101 Климанова С.Г., Трусова А.В., Киселев АС, Бернцев В.А., Громыко Д.И., Илюк Р.Д., Крупицкий ЕМ. ... Klimanova S.G., Trusova A.V., Kiselev A.S., Berntsev V.A., D.I. Gromyko, Ilyuk R.D., Krupitsky E.M. ... veshchestv [Clinical and psychological factors of motivation for drug and alcohol abstinence]. Psikhicheskoe zdorov’e [Journal of Mental Health], 2010. Vol. 8 (7), pp. 36—42. 2. Ilyuk R.D., Gromyko D.I., Berno-Bellekur I.V. Osobennosti emotsional’noi i motivatsionnoi sfery narkozavisimykh i ikh rol’ v prekrashchenii potrebleniya psikhoaktivnykh veshchestv [Features of the emotional and motivational sphere of drug addicts and their role in cessation of drug use]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. of St. Petersburg V.M. Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute, 2008. 35 p. 3. Polskaya N.A., Razvaliaeva A.Yu. Razrabotka oprosnika emotsional’noi disregulyatsii [The Development Of The “Emotion Dysregulation” Questionnaire]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017. Vol. 25 (4), pp. 71—93. doi:10.17759/cpp.2017250406. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). 4. Klimenkova E.N., Kholmogorova A.B. Validizatsiya metodik diagnostiki sotsial’noi trevozhnosti na rossiiskoi podrostkovoi vyborke [Validation Of Methods Of Diagnosis Of Social Anxiety On The Russian Adolescents]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017. Vol. 25 (1), pp. 28—39. doi:10.17759/cpp.2017250103. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). 5. Kolomeichuk A.V., Ledvanova T.Yu., Grechkina E.A. Razlichiya vnutrennei kartiny bolezni v zavisimosti ot klinicheskikh variantov anozognozii u lits s alkogol’noi zavisimost’yu [Differences of the internal illness representation depending on clinical types of anosognosia in patients with alcohol dependence]. Tyumenskii meditsinskii zhurnal [Tyumen Medical Journal], 2014, no. 16 (1), pp. 41—42. 6. Kolpakov Ya.V., Yaltonskii V.M. Izuchenie kognitivno-povedencheskikh prediktorov motivatsii k lecheniyu u lits, zavisimykh ot alkogolya, v svyazi s zadachami profilaktiki [The study of cognitive and behavioral predictors of treatment motivation in alcohol addicted patients for the purposes of prevention]. Voprosy narkologii [Journal of Addiction Problems], 2016, no. 1, pp. 10—19. 7. Kolpakov Ya.V. Motivatsiya na psikhoterapiyu u zhenshchin, zavisimykh ot psikhoaktivnykh veshchestv [Motivation for psychotherapy among drug addicted women]. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii [Clinical Psychology in Russia], 2011, no. 6. Available at: http://medpsy.ru (Accessed 01.03.2018). 8. Konina M.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Oprosnik disfunktsional’nykh ubezhdenii pri pogranichnom rasstroistve lichnosti (PBQ-BPD): adaptatsiya dlya russkoyazychnoi vyborki [The Personality Beliefs Questionnaire in borderline personality disorder (PBQ-BPD): adaptation for Russian-speaking selection]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24 (3), pp. 126—143. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240308. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). 9. Nasledov A.D. IBM SPSS 20 i AMOS: professional’nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh [IBM SPSS 20 and AMOS: professional statistical analysis]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2013. 416 p. 10. Rychkova O.V., Kholmogorova A.B. Adaptatsiya metodiki diagnostiki sotsial’noi angedonii (RSAS) na rossiiskoi vyborke [Adaptation of Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS) on Russian sample]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24 (4), pp. 62—96. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240404. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2018. Т. 26. № 3 Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3 102 11. Safuanov F.S., Baranova O.V., Igonin A.L. Kliniko-psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy formirovaniya anozognozii bol’nykh alkogolizmom [Elektronnyi resurs] [Clinical psychology mechanisms of anosognosia among patients with alcohol dependence]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies], 2011, no. 2 (16). Available at: http://psystudy.ru. (Accessed 01.03.2018). (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). 12. Trusova A.V. Motivatsionnoe interv’yuirovanie v kompleksnoi terapii alkogol’noi zavisimosti: opyt primeneniya i otsenka effektivnosti [Motivational interviewing as a part of complex treatment of alcohol dependence: experience of use and evaluation of effectiveness]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva [Review of psychiatry and clinical psychology named after V.M. Bekhterev], 2015, no. 4, pp. 100—108. 13. Shmelev A.G. Prakticheskaya testologiya. Testirovanie v obrazovanii, prikladnoi psikhologii i upravlenii personalom [Practical testology: tests in education, applied psychology and management]. Moscow: Maska, 2013. 688 p. 14. Shustov D.I., Tuchina O.D., Fedotov I.A., Novikov S.A. Autoagressivnaya alkogol’naya lichnost’ [Self-destructive alcoholic personality]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2016. Vol. 24 (3), pp. 89—109. doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240306. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). 15. Yaltonskii V.M. Teoreticheskaya model’ motivatsii k lecheniyu zavisimosti ot psikhoaktivnykh veshchestv [Theoretical model of motivation for treatment among addicted patients]. Voprosy narkologii [Journal of Addiction Problems], 2009, no. 6, pp. 60—69. 16. Bertholet N., Dukes K., Horton N.J., Palfai T.P., Pedley A., Saitz R. Factor structure of the SOCRATES questionnaire in hospitalized medical patients. Addictive Behaviors, 2009. Vol. 34 (6—7), pp. 568—572. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.03.013 17. Bickhard M.H. An integration of motivation and cognition. In L. Smith, C. Rogers & P. Tomlinson (eds.) Development and Motivation: Joint Perspectives. Leicester: British Psychological Society, 2003, pp. 41—56. 18. Bickhard M.H. Motivation and emotion: An interactive process model. In R.D. Ellis, N. Newton (eds.) The Caldron of Consciousness. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 2000, pp. 161—178. 19. Braver T.S., Krug M.K., Chiew K.S. et al. Mechanisms of motivation—cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2014. Vol. 14 (2), pp. 443—472. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0300-0 20. Burrow-Sanchez J.J. Identifying the Factor Structure of the SOCRATES in a Sample of Latino Adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2014. Vol. 28 (1), pp. 276—281. doi:10.1037/a0033605 21. Carey K.B., Maisto S.A., Carey M.P., Purnine D.M. Measuring Readiness-to- Change Substance Misuse Among Psychiatric Outpatients I. Reliability and Validity of Self-Report Measures. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2001. Vol. 62 (1), pp. 79—88. doi:10.15288/jsa.2001.62.79 22. Chun Y.-M., Cho S.-M., Shin S.-M. Factor structure of a Korean-language version of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) in a clinical sample of clients with alcohol dependence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2010. Vol. 24 (4), pp. 555—562. doi:10.1037/a0021492 103 Климанова С.Г., Трусова А.В., Киселев АС, Бернцев В.А., Громыко Д.И., Илюк Р.Д., Крупицкий ЕМ. ... Klimanova S.G., Trusova A.V., Kiselev A.S., Berntsev V.A., D.I. Gromyko, Ilyuk R.D., Krupitsky E.M. ... 23. Coulson C., Ng F., Geertsema M., Dodd S., Berk M. Client-reported reasons for non-engagement in drug and alcohol treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2009. Vol. 28 (4), pp. 372—378. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00054.x 24. De Leon G., Melnick G., Hawke J. The motivation-readiness factor in drug treatment implications for research and policy. In J.A. Levy, R.C. Stephens, D.C. McBride (eds.) Emergent Issues in the Field of Drug Abuse. Stamford, CT: JAI, 1999, pp. 103—129. 25. De Weert-van Oene G.H., Gongora V., von Sternberg K., de Jong C.A. Motivation for treatment and motivation for change in substance-dependent patients with co- occurring psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 2015. Vol. 47 (5), pp. 393—400. doi:10.1080/02791072.2015.1079669 26. Del Boca F.K., Darkes J. The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction, 2003. Vol. 98 (s2), pp. 1—12. doi:10.1046/j.1359-6357.2003.00586.x 27. DiClemente C.C., Bellino L.E., Neavins T.M. Motivation for change and alcoholism treatment. Alcohol Research and Health, 1999. Vol. 23 (2), pp. 86—92. 28. DiClemente C.C., Nidecker M., Bellack A.S. Motivation and the stages of change among individuals with severe mental illness and substance abuse disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2008. Vol. 34 (1), pp. 25—35. doi:10.1016/j. jsat.2006.12.034 29. DiClemente C.C., Scott C.W. Stages of change: Interactions with treatment compliance and involvement. NIDA Research Monograph, 1997. Vol. 165, pp. 131—156. 30. DiClemente C.C., Prochaska J.O. Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change: Stages of change and addictive behaviors. In W.R. Miller, N. Heather (eds.) Treating Addictive Behaviors. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, pp. 3—24. 31. Doerfler L.A., Melle D., McLaughlin T., Fisher W.H. Do Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) scores predict readmission to an inpatient substance abuse treatment program for adolescents? Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 2016. Vol. 25 (6), pp. 516—521. doi:10.1080/1067828X.2015.1111822 32. Figlie N.B., Dunn J., Laranjeira R. Factor structure of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) in alcohol dependent outpatients. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 2004. Vol. 26 (2), pp. 91—99. 33. Kelly J.F., Greene M.C. Where there’s a will there’s a way: A longitudinal investigation of the interplay between recovery motivation and self-efficacy in predicting treatment outcome. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2014. Vol. 28 (3), pp. 928—934. doi: 10.1037/a0034727 34. Kelly S.M., O’Grady K.E., Mitchell S.G., Brown B.S., Schwartz R.P. Predictors of methadone treatment retention from a multi-site study: a survival analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2011. Vol. 117 (2—3), pp. 170—175. doi:10.1016/j. drugalcdep.2011.01.008 35. Maisto S.A., Chung T.A., Cornelius J.R., Martin C.S. Factor structure of the SOCRATES in a clinical sample of adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2003. Vol. 17 (2), pp. 98—107. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.17.2.98 36. Maisto S.A., Conigliaro J., McNeil M., Kraemer K., O’Connor M., Kelley M.E. Factor structure of the SOCRATES in a sample of primary care patients. Addictive Behaviors, 1999. Vol. 24 (6), pp. 879—892. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(99)00047-7 Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2018. Т. 26. № 3 Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3 104 37. Maisto S.A., Krenek M., Chung T., Martin C.S., Clark D., Cornelius J. A comparison of the concurrent and predictive validity of three measures of readiness to change alcohol use in a clinical sample of adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 2011. Vol. 23 (4), pp. 983—994. doi:10.1037/a0024136 38. Miller W.R. Motivation for treatment: A review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin, 1985. Vol. 98 (1), pp. 84—107. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.84 39. Miller W.R. Tonigan J.S. Assessing drinkers’ motivations for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 1996. Vol. 10 (2), pp. 81—89. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.10.2.81 40. Palij M., Rosenblum A., Magura S. Assessing Cocaine Users’ Motivation for Change: Preliminary Results for the Cocaine Version of the SOCRATES (SOCRATES-C). In 69th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association in Boston, MA 28 February 1998. doi:10.13140/2.1.2294.9443 41. Parvizifard A., Ahmad H.J.B.H., Baba M.B., Sulaiman T. Psychometric Properties of the Iranian Version of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2012. Vol. 4 (2), pp. 246—252. doi:10.5539/ijps.v4n2p246 42. Rice S.L., Hagler K.J., Tonigan J.S. Longitudinal trajectories of readiness to change: Alcohol use and help-seeking behavior. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2014. Vol. 75 (3), pp. 486—495. doi:10.15288/jsad.2014.75.486 43. Shen Q., McLellan A.T., Merrill J.C. Client’s perceived need for treatment and its impact on outcome. Substance Abuse, 2000. Vol. 21 (3), pp. 179—192. doi:10.1080/08897070009511431 44. Simpson D.D., Joe G.W. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 1993. Vol. 30 (2), pp. 357—368. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.30.2.357 45. Wagner V., Acier D., Dietlin J.-E. Outpatient Addiction Treatment for Problematic Alcohol Use: What Makes Patients Who Dropped Out Different from Those Who Did Not? Substance Use & Misuse, 2018. Vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1893—1906 . doi:10.10 80/10826084.2018.1441310 46. Yeh M.Y. A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the stage of change readiness and treatment eagerness scale. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2009. Vol. 18 (17), pp. 2494—2502. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02592.x 47. Zullino D.F., Krenz S., Frösard E., Montagrin Y., Kolly S., Chatton A., Manghi R.A., Broers B. Psychometric properties of a French-language version of the stage of change readiness and treatment eagerness scale (SOCRATES). Addiction Research & Theory, 2007. Vol. 15 (2), pp. 153—160. doi:10.1080/16066350601179514 Консультативная психология и психотерапия. Т. 26. № 3. С. 105—126 doi: 10.17759/cpp.2018260306 ISSN: 2075-3470 (печатный 2311-9446 (online) © 2018 ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3, рр. 105—126 doi: 10.17759/cpp.2018260306 ISSN: 2075-3470 (print) ISSN: 2311-9446 (online) © 2018 Moscow State University of Psychology & Education * Полякова Юлия Михайловна, медицинский психолог, ГБУЗ «ПКБ № 4 имени П.Б. Ганнушкина ДЗМ», клинический и семейный консультант, Москва, Россия Сорокова Марина Геннадьевна, доктор педагогических наук, кандидат физико- математических наук, профессор кафедры прикладной математики факультета информационных технологий, ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ, Москва, Россия, e-mail: sorokovamg@mgppu.ru *** Гаранян Наталья Георгиевна, доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры клинической психологии и психотерапии, факультет консультативной и клинической психологии, ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ, Москва, Россия, e-mail: Для цитаты: Полякова Ю.М., Сорокова МГ, Гаранян Н.Г. Факторная структура и надежность шкалы взаимной адаптации в паре (DAS) в российской выборке // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2018. Т. 26. № 3. С. 105—126. doi: ФАКТОРНАЯ СТРУКТУРА И НАДЕЖНОСТЬ ШКАЛЫ ВЗАИМНОЙ АДАПТАЦИИ В ПАРЕ (DAS) В РОССИЙСКОЙ ВЫБОРКЕ Ю.М. ПОЛЯКОВА*, ГБУЗ «ПКБ № 4 имени П.Б. Ганнушкина ДЗМ», Москва, Россия, polyakovaju@gmail.com М.Г. СОРОКОВА**, ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ, Москва, Россия, sorokovamg@mgppu.ru Н.Г. ГАРАНЯН***, ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ, Москва, Россия, garanian@mail.ru Представлены результаты апробации русскоязычной версии опросника Шкала взаимной адаптации в паре — DAS (Dyadic Adjustment Scale) Г. Спа- Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2018. Т. 26. № 3 Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2018. Vol. 26, no. 3 106 ниера. Валидизация опросника проводилась на двух выборках (N=302), включающих супружеские пары и лиц, состоящих в браке. Эксплоратор- ный факторный анализ установил трехфакторную структуру методики, подтвержденную методом конфирматорного факторного анализа. Выделенные шкалы и инструмент в целом обладают высокими показателями надежности внутренней согласованностью и расщепленной надежностью. Установлены связи между субшкалами опросника Шкала взаимной адаптации в паре и других методик, измеряющих теоретически близкие конструкты, что свидетельствует о приемлемой конструктной валидности методики. Корреляционный анализ между показателями шкалы взаимной адаптации в паре и параметрами перфекционизма показал, что склонность респондентов к селектированию собственных признаков несовершенства и неудач отрицательно связана с субъективным ощущением благополучия супружеских отношений в паре, что подтверждает приемлемую внешнюю валидность апробируемой методики. |