Сделка с правосудием в США. сделка с правосудием особенности англосаксонской и континентальной правовой традиции
 Скачать 230.54 Kb.
|
|
Detlef D. Der strafprozessuale Vergleich // Strafverteidiger. 1982. №2. Dr. Robert Winslow. A Comparative Criminology Tour of the World // http: www-rohan.sdsu.edu.01.06.2007. Dyer G. M. Criminal Defendants Waiver of the Right to Appeal: An Unacceptable Condition of Negotiated Sentence or Plea Bargain. Notre Dame Law Review. 1990. № 65. Easterbrook F. Criminal Procedure as a Market System // J. Legal Stud. 1983. № 12. Easterbrook F. Plea Bargaining as Compromise // Yale L.J. 1992. № 101. Esposito A. K., Safferling C. J. M. Report - Recent Case Law of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) in Strafsachen (Criminal Law) // German Law Journal. 2008. № 5. Feeley M. M. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases In a Lower Court. New York, 1979. Fisher G. Plea Bargaining’s Triumph: A History of Plea Bargaining in America. Stanford, 2003. Fontaine P. A new idea for Europe. The Schuman declaration — 1950-2000. Sec. ed. Luxembourg. 2000. Fosdick R. «Police Administration» in Roscoe Pound and Felix Rankfwter (eds.) Criminal Justice in Cleveland: Report of the Administration of Criminal Justice in Cleveland, Ohio. Cleveland, 1922. Frank O. Bowman, III. When Sentences Don’t Make Sense // Wash. Post. 2003. 15 Aug. Freccero S. P. An Introduction to the New Italian Criminal Procedure //Am. J. Crim. L. 1994. №21. Gazal O. Plea Bargains Only for the Guilty // University of Michigan Law School. The John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series. 2004. Paper 30. 165 Georgia Department of Public Welfare. Crime and the Georgia Courts // Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1924. № 16. Guifford D. Significant Reform of Plea-Bargaining: Holding Back the Freedom of Prosecution Action. Morgantown, 1991. Harmonizing substantive criminal law values and criminal procedure: the case of Alford and nolo contendere pleas // Cornell Law Review. 2003. 88-th ed. № 6. Harno A. J. The Workings of the Parale Board and Its Relation to the Courts // Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Low and Criminology. 1926. № 19. Hayek F.A. Law, Legislation and Liberty. V.I. London: Rules and Older, 1973. Healey P. W. The Nature and Consequences of the Plea of Nolo Contendere // Neb. L. Rev. 1954. № 33. Henderson S. E. Hijacked from Both Sides-Why Religious Extremists and Religious Bigots Share an Interest in Preventing Academic Discourse on Criminal Jurisprudence Based on the First Principles of Christianity // Idaho L. Rev. 2000. № 37. Herbeck D., Warner G. Battle on the Bench: Federal Judges Around the Nation // Buffalo News. 2004. 20 Febr. Herman G. N. Plea Bargaining. 1997. Herrmann J. Bargaining Justice — A Bargain for German Criminal Justice? П U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1992. № 53. Innocence And The Death Penalty: The Increasing Danger Of Executing The Innocent. Death Penalty Information Center, 1997. Interview with Mr. Arkin // Oakland Public Defender. 1966. 11 Jan. Interview with Mr. Conn // Oakland Public Defender. 1966. 12 Jan. Interview with Mr. Nunes // Oakland Public Defender. 1968. 13 Febr. 166 Jash M. Police cautions and the vanishing differences between legality and discretion in european criminal justice systems // German Law Journal. 2004. №. 10. John T. Elfvin Here — Are Battling John D. Ashcroft’s Justice Department // Buffalo News. 2004. 20 Febr. Judge John S. Martin. Jr. Let Judges Do Their Jobs // N.Y. Times. 24 June. Just Cause or Just Because? Prosecution and Plea-Bargaining Resulting in Prison Sentences on Low- Level Drug Charges in California and Arizona // RAND Corp. Santa Monica. 2005. Summary XX. Kaden J. Therapy for Convicted Sex Offenders: Pursuing Rehabilitation Without Incrimination // J. Crim. L. & Criminology. 1998. № 89. Kinsley M. Why Innocent People Confess // www.washingtonpost.com. 30.03.2007. Lane-Recker E. Nolo Contendere in North Carolina И N.C. L. Rev. 1956. № 34. Langbein J. H. Totrture and The Lam of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancient Regime. Chicago, 1977. Langbein J. H. Compative Criminal Procedure: Germany. St. Paul, 1977. Langbein J. H. Land Without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It // Mich. L. Rev. 1979. № 78. Langbein J. H. Torture and Plea Bargaining // University of Chicago Law Review. 1978. № 46. Langer M. From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure H Harvard International Law Journal. 2004. № 1. Luther C. Ward agrees to plea bargain (Issue date: 26.05.2005) // http: www.dennews.com. 03.06.2007. 167 Lynch D. The Impropriety of Plea Agreements: A Tale of Two Counties // Law & Soc. Inquiry. 1994. № 19 Lynch T. The case against plea bargain // Law Cato Institute. 2003. Major Steven E. Wallburn. Should the Military Adopt an Alford-Type Guilty Plea? // A.F. L. Rev. 1998. № 44. Majors S. Child pom: prosecution problem. Computer Crime Research Center//http: www.crime-research.org. 10.08.2006. Mattei U. A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance // Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 2003. № 10. Mattei U. Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law // Am. J. Comp. L. 1994. № 42. Maturana H., Varela F. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambala, 1988. Maxfield L. D., Kramer J. H. Substantial Assistance: An Empirical Yardstick Gauging Equity in Current Federal Policy and Practice. 1998. McDonald W. F. The Prosecutor’s Plea Bargaining Decisions // The Prosecutor. 1979. Me Laughlin Edward J. Selected Excerpts from the 1968 Report of the New York State Joint Legislative Committee on Crime, Its Causes, Control, and Effect on Society // Criminal Law Bulletin. 1969. № 5. Memorandum from Attorney General John Ashcroft Setting Forth Justice Department’s Charging and Plea Policies // Fed. Sent. Rep. 129. 2003. № 16. Miller J. The Compmmise of Criminal Cases // Southern California Law Review. 1927. № 1. Mireille Delmas-Marty. Les grands systemes de politique criminelle. Paris, 1992. Missouri Association for Criminal Justice, and New York. Macmillian. 1926. Missouri Association for Criminal Justice, Survey Committe. 1926. 168 Moise В. The Case Against Plea Bargaining // American Bar Journal. 1976. №62. MoleyR. Politics and Criminal Prosecution. New York, 1929. Moley R. The Vanishing Jury // Southern California Law Review. 1926. №2. National Center for Juvenile Justice. Office of Justice and Delinquency Prevention Report. Juviniles Facing Criminal Sanctions: three states that changed the rules. 2000. April. Negotiating The Waters Of International Cartel Prosecutions Antitrust Division Policies Relating To Plea Agreements In International Cases - headed by the U.S. Department Of Justice. San Francisco. 04.03.1999. Nelson F. H. Criminal Justice in Virginia. Charlottesville. University of Virginia Institute for Research in the Social Sciences. 1931. New York State Crime Commission Report to the Commission of the Sub-Committee on Statistics. New York City, 1927. New York Times. 1968. 12 Febr. NY Criminal Procedure // http: www.gauthierlawfirm.com. 11.03.2006. Olin D. Plea Bargain // The New Yourk Times Magazine. 2002. 29 Sept. Peterson T. Man Goes to Prison for Baseball Bat Assault // The Bulletin. 2002. 01 Febr. Pizzi W. T., Marafioti L. The New Italian Code of Criminal Procedure: The Dificulties of Building an Adversarial Trial System on a Civil Law Foundation //Yale J. Int’l L. 1992. № 17. Plea agreements in Bosnia and Herzegovina: practices before the courts and their complience with international human rights standarts / OSCE Report, dedicated to the Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sec. ed. 2006. May. PoundR. Criminal Justice in America. N. Y., 1930. 169 Prisoner’s dilemma ( From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) // http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma. 06.05.2006. Project On Minimum Standards For Criminal Justice (1967) Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty. American Bar Association. New York, 1967. Radelet M. L., Bedau H A. The Execution Of The Innocent // Law And Contemporary Problems. USA. 1998. Vol. 61. № 4. Reinganum J. Sentencing Guidelines, Judicial Discretion, and Plea Bargaining I I RAND Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 31. Report and proposal on section 5kl.l the u.s. sentencing guidelines // American College of Trial Lawyers. 1999. Report of the President’s Commission on Crime in the District of Columbia. 1966. Roberts P. C. The Police State Is Closer Than You Think // http: www.informationclearinghouse.com. Rosett A., Cressey D. Justice by Consent: Plea Bargains in the American Courthouse. N. Y., 1976. Rossman D. Criminal Law Advocacy: Guilty Pleas. 1996. Roxin C. Strafverfahrensrecht. 25-th ed. Miinchen, 1998. Sanchirico C. W. Character Evidence and the Object of Trial. Virginia, Charlottesville. 2001. Febr. San Francisco Committee On Crime. A Report on the Criminal Courts of San Francisco, Part I: The Superior Court Backlog-Consequences and Remedies. San Francisco, 1970. Schlesinger R. B. Comparative Criminal Procedure: A Plea for Utilizing Foreign Experience // Buff. L. Rev. 1977. № 26. Schulhofer S. J. A Wake-Up Call from the Plea Bargaining Trenches // Law & Soc. Inquiry. 1994. № 19. Schulhofer S. J. Criminal Justice Discretion as a Regulatory System // J. Legal Stud. 1988. № 17. |