Сделка с правосудием в США. сделка с правосудием особенности англосаксонской и континентальной правовой традиции

• Название: сделка с правосудием особенности англосаксонской и континентальной правовой традиции
• Анкор: Сделка с правосудием в США
• Дата: 28.09.2022
• Размер: 230.54 Kb.
• Имя файла: 01004165761 (1).docx
• Тип: Диссертация; #703962
• страница: 15 из 15

Schulhofer S. J. Plea Bargaining as Disaster // Yale L.J. 1992. № 101.



170

144. 
     Scott R., Stuntz W. Plea Bargaining as Contract // Yale L.J. 1992. № 101.
     
145. 
     Shipley C. J. The Alford Plea: A Necessary but Unpredictable Tool for the Criminal Defendant // Iowa L. Rev. 1987. № 72.
     
146. 
     Stith K., Cabranes J. A. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. 1998.
     
147. 
     Stribopoulos J. Lessons from the Pupil: A Canadian Solution to the American Exclusionary Rule Debate // B.C. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 1999. № 22.
     
148. 
     Thaman S. C. Europe’s New Jury Systems: The Cases of Spain and Russia // Law & Contemp. Probs. 1999. № 62.
     
149. 
     The Illinois Crime Survey. Illinois Association for Criminal Justice. Chicago, 1929.
     
150. 
     The President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. The challenge of crime in a Free society. Washington D. C., 1967.
     
151. 
     Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Selected OSCE Participating States. Report by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) to the Special OSCE Meeting on the Prevention of Torture. Vienna, 2003.
     
152. 
     Train A. The Prisoner at the Bar (3rd ed.) N. Y., 1924.
     
153. 
     Tulkens F. Negotiated Justice // European Criminal Procedures. Mireille Delmas-Marty & J. R. Spencer eds., 2002.
     
154. 
     U.S. General Accounting Office, Federal Drug Offenses: Departures from Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Fiscal Years 1999-2001.2003.
     
155. 
     U.S. National Commission On Law Observance And Enforcement. Report On Crime And The Foreign Bom. Washington. DC., 1931.
     
156. 
     United States sentencing guidelines 2004: an experiment that has failed // American college of trial lawyers. 2004.
     
157. 
     Urbina I. New York’s Federal Judges Protest Sentencing Procedures // N.Y. Times. 2003. 08 Dec.
     

171

144. 
     Vassalli G. Premessa // Istituto poligrafico e zecca dello Stato, Progetto Preliminare del Codice di Procedure Penale. 1988. № 5.
     
145. 
     Vinegrad A. The Judiciary’s Response to the PROTECT Act // N.Y.L.J. 2004. 08 Jan.
     
146. 
     Volker G. Absprachen im Strafprozess // Neue Zeitschrift fur Strafrecht. 1987.
     
147. 
     Walsh E., Eggen D. Ashcroft Orders Tally of Lighter Sentences: Critics Say He Wants “Blacklist” of Judges // Wash. Post. 2003. 07 Aug.
     
148. 
     Warren B. The State of the Judiciary // A.B.A. J. 1970. № 56.
     
149. 
     Weigend T. Prosecution: Comparative Aspects // Encyclopedia of Crime & Justice. T. 3. Joshua Dressier ed., 2-nd ed. 2002.
     
150. 
     Wexler D. B. Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Criminal Courts // Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1993. № 3.
     
151. 
     Wexler D. B., Winick B. J. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Criminal Justice Mental Health Issues // Mental & Phys. Disability L. Rep. 1992. №16.
     
152. 
     Wilson J. 9. Thinking about Crime. N. Y., 1975.
     
153. 
     Winick B. J. Sex Offender Laws in the 1990s: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis // Psych. 1998. № 4.
     
154. 
     Xaller M. H Urban Crime and Criminal Justice: The Chicago Case // Journal of Ameriran History. 1970. №51.
     
155. 
     Young C.J. Sentencing Memoranda. United States. District Court. District Of Massachusetts. 2004. 18 June.
     
156. 
     Yue Ma. Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in the United States, France, Germany, and Italy: A Comparative Perspective. // USA. International Criminal Justice Review. 2002, № 12.
     
157. 
     Zamora S. The Americanization of Mexican Law: Non-Trade Issues in the North American Free Trade Agreement // Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 1993. №24.
     
158. 
     http: // www.abanet.org.
     
159. 
     http: // www.access.gpo.gov.
     

144. 
     http: И www.alebedev.ru.
     
145. 
     http: // www.bazynov.narod.ru.
     
146. 
     http://www.bmj.de.
     
147. 
     http: //www.criminalattomey.com.
     
148. 
     http: // www.dictionary.law.com.
     
149. 
     http://www.encarta.msn.com.
     
150. 
     http: П www.encyclopedia.com.
     
151. 
     http: // www.en.wikipedia.org.
     
152. 
     http: // www.expertlaw.com.
     
153. 
     http: // www.familylawyerservice.
     
154. 
     http: // www.judicialaccountability.org.
     
155. 
     http: 11 www.juscomp.org.
     
156. 
     http: // www.law.edu.ru.
     
157. 
     http: // www.legalmatch.com.
     
158. 
     http: //www.monstersandcritics.com.
     
159. 
     http://www.multitran.ru.
     
160. 
     http: // www.nolo.com.
     
161. 
     http: // www.oninformation.com.
     
162. 
     http: 11 www.pbs.org.
     
163. 
     http: // www.public.findlaw.com.
     
164. 
     http: // www.pwn.com.
     
165. 
     http:// www.protectionaids.co.uk.