Цифровое поколение. Солдатова Г. У., Рассказова Е. И., Нестик Т. А
 Скачать 3.39 Mb.
|
|
369 Report of Expert Panel for DCMS «Identifying the Routes by which Chil- dren View Pornography Online: Implications for Future Policy-makers Seeking to Limit Viewing», Submitted on 12th November 2015. Электронный ресурс / URL: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/18878/1/Report_of_DCMS_Expert_Panel__ Autumn_2015__FINAL_.pdf Rican P. Family values may be responsible for bullying // Studia psycho- logica. 1995. Vol. 37. № 1. P. 31–36. Rideout V. VJR Consulting Inc. The Common Sense Census: Media use by tweens and teens / S. Pai (Е. USA: Common Sense Media, 2015. Rideout V.J., Foehr U.G., Roberts D.F. Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds. Washington (DC): Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2010. Rogers E.M. The diffusion of innovation 5th edition. N.Y.: Simon and Schuster, 2003. Roland E., Idsøe T. Aggression and bullying // Aggressive behavior. 2001. Vol. 27. № 6. P. 446–462. Rosen L.D., Lim A.F., Felt J., Carrier L.M., Cheever N.A., Lara-Ruiz J.M. Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits // Computers in human behavior. 2014. Vol. 35. P. 364–375. Rosen L.D., Maguire P. Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta- analysis // Anxiety Research. 1990. Vol. 3. № 3. P. 175–191. Rosen L.D., Sears D.C., Weil M.M. Treating technophobia: A longitudinal evaluation of the computerphobia reduction program // Computers in human behavior. 1993. Vol. 9. № 1. P. 27–50. Rosen L.D., Cheever N.A., Carrier L.M. The impact of parental attachment style, limit setting, and monitoring on teen MySpace behavior // Journal of Ap- plied Developmental Psychology. 2008. Vol. 29. P. 459–471. Salimkhan G., Manago A.M., Greenfield P.M. The construction of the vir- tual self on MySpace // Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2010. Vol. 4. № 1 Электронный ресурс / URL: https://cyberpsy- chology.eu/article/view/4231/3275 Sampasa-Kanyinga H., Roumeliotis P., Xu H. Associations between Cy- berbullying and School Bullying Victimization and Suicidal Ideation, Plans and Attempts among Canadian Schoolchildren Электронный ресурс // PLoS ONE. 2014. Vol. 9(7). Р. e102145 / URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0102145 Sandseter E.B.H., Kennair L.E.O. Children’s risky play from an evolution- ary perspective: The anti-phobic effects of thrilling experiences // Evolutionary psychology. 2011. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 237–252. Scheier M.F., Carver C.S. Goals and confidence as self-regulatory ele- ments underlying health and illness behavior // The self-regulation of health and illness behavior / L.D. Cameron, H. Leventhal (Eds). L.: Routledge, 2003. P. 17–41. Oberauer K., Kliegl R. Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hu- man Perception and Performance. 2004. Vol. 30(4) P. 689–707. Olweus D. Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993. Ophir E., Nass C., Wagner A.D. Cognitive control in media multitask- ers // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Vol. 106. № 37. P. 15583–15587. Osiceanu M.E. Psychological Implications of Modern Technologies: «Technofobia» versus «Technophilia» // Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sci- ences. 2015. Vol. 180. P. 1137–1144. Owens E.W., Behun R.J., Manning J.C., Reid R.C. The impact of Internet pornography on adolescents: A review of the research // Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. 2012. Vol. 19. № 1–2. P. 99–122. Page R., Harper R., Frobenius M. From small stories to networked narra- tive: The evolution of personal narratives in Facebook status updates // Narra- tive Inquiry. 2013. Vol. 23. № 1. P. 192–213. Pantzar M. Domestication of everyday life technology: dynamic views on the social histories of artifacts // Design Issues. 1997. Vol. 13. № 3. P. 52–65. Park S., Na E.Y., Kim E. The relationship between online activities, neti- quette and cyberbullying // Children and youth services review. 2014. Vol. 42. P. 74–81. Peek H. The selfie in the digital age: From social media to sexting // Psy- chiatric Times. 2014. Vol. 31. № 12. P. 28G–28G. Pells K., Portela M.J.O., Revollo P.E. Experiences of Peer Bullying among Adolescents and Associated Effects on Young Adult Outcomes: Longitudinal Evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru and Viet Nam. Innocenti Discussion Pa- per 2016-03. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research, 2016 / URL: https://www. unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/IDP_2016_03.pdf Pinch T.J., Bijker W.E. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of // The Social Constructions of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. 1987. Vol. 17. P. 1–6. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1 // On the horizon. 2001. Vol. 9. № 5. P. 1–6. Presno C. Taking the byte out of Internet anxiety: instructional techniques that reduce computer/Internet anxiety in the classroom // Journal of educa- tional computing research. 1998. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 147–161. Protecting children against harmful content. Council of Europe, 2009 Электронный ресурс // Council of Europe 2009 / URL: https://edoc.coe.int/ en/index.php?controller=get-file&freeid=5779 Ramaswamy Vol., Ozcan K. The co-creation paradigm. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 2014. Renn O. A model for an analytic deliberative process in risk management // Environmental Science & Technology. 1999. Vol. 33. № 18. P. 3049–3055. Цифровое поколение России компетентность и безопасность Литература 371 Smith P.K., Mahdavi J., Carvalho M., Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyber- bullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils // Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 2008. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 376–385. Sniehotta F.F. Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: Plans, planning, and self-regulation // British journal of health psychology. 2009. Vol. 14. № 2. P. 261–273. Soldatova G., Rasskazova E., Zotova E., Lebesheva M., Geer M., Roggendorf P. Russian kids online: key findings of the eu kids online ii survey in russia // Foundation for Internet Development, 2014 Электронный ресурс / URL: Available at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60575/ Soldatova G., Zotova E. EU kids online: National perspectives: Russia // EU Kids Online: National perspectives, Oslo, October 2012. Oslo: Policy Press, 2012. P. 55–56. Soldatova G., Zotova E. Coping with online risks: The experience of Russian schoolchildren // Journal of Children and Media. 2013. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 44–59. Sørensen K.H. Domestication: the enactment of technology // Domestica- tion of Media and Technology / T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, K.J. Ward (Eds.). Maidenhead (UK): Open University Press, 2006. P. 40–61. Sparrow B., Liu J., Wegner D.M. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips // Science. 2011. Vol. 333. № 6043. P. 776–778. Srivastava L. Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour // Beha viour & Information Technology. 2005. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 111–129. Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. N.Y.: Harper, 1991. Subrahmanyam K., Smahel D. Digital youth: The role of media in develop- ment. N.Y.: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. Sutton S. Transtheoretical model applied to smoking cessation // Understanding and Changing Health Behaviour: From Health Beliefs to Self-Regulation / C. Abraham, P. Norman, M.E. Conner (Eds.). Amsterdam: Harwood, 2000. P. 207–225. Symons K., Ponnet K., Emmery K., Walrave M., Heirman W. Parental Knowledge of Adolescents’ Online Content and Contact Risks // Journal of youth and adolescence. 2017. Vol. 46. № 2. P. 401–416. Tarpley T. Children, the Internet, and other new technologies // Singer D., Singer J. (Eds.). Handbook of Children and the Media. Thousands Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 2001. P. 547–556. Teppers E., Luyckx K., Klimstra T.A., Goossens L. Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: A longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect // Journal of adolescence. 2014. Vol. 37. № 5. P. 691–699. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992. Vol. 1. Schimmenti A., Caretti Vol. Psychic retreats or psychic pits?: Unbearable states of mind and technological addiction // Psychoanalytic Psychology. 2010. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 115–132. Schmaltz D.L., Colistra C.M., Evans K.E. Social media sites as a means of coping with a threatened social identity // Leisure Sciences. 2015. Vol. 37(1). P. 20–38. Schouten A.P. Adolescents’ online self-disclosure and self-presentation. Amsterdam: The Amsterdam School of Communications Research, 2007 Электронный ресурс / URL: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/4172050/143769_ schouten.pdf Schweizer T., Kan K., Hung Y., Tam F., Naglie G., Graham S. Brain activity during driving with distraction: an immersive fMRI study Электронный ресурс You // Coding 2 Learn. 29 july 2013 / URL: http://www.coding2learn.org/ blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-computers/ Shapiro L.A.S., Margolin G. Growing up wired: Social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development // Clinical child and family psychol- ogy review. 2014. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 1–18. Sherman L.E., Michikyan M., Greenfield P.M. The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends // Cyberpsy- chology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 2013. Vol. 7. № 2 Электронный ресурс / URL: http://www.cdmc.ucla.edu/PG_Media_bib- lio_files/Sherman%20et%20al.pdf Shetgiri R. Bullying and victimization among children // Advances in pe- diatrics. 2013. Vol. 60. № 1. P. 33–51. Shin W., Kang H. Adolescents’ privacy concerns and information dis- closure online: The role of parents and the Internet // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 54. P. 114–123. Shin W., Lwin M.O. How does «talking about the Internet with others» affect teenagers’ experience of online risks? The role of active mediation by parents, peers, and school teachers // New media & society. 2017. Vol. 19. № 7. P. 1109–1126. Silverstone R. Domesticating domestication: reflections on the life of a concept // Domestication of Media and Technology / T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, K.J. Ward (Eds.). Maidenhead (UK): Open University Press, 2006. P. 229–248. Small G., Vorgan G. Meet your iBrain // Scientific American Mind. 2008. Vol. 19. № 5. P. 42–49. Smith A. U.S. views of technology and the future. science in the next 50 years // Pew research center. April, 2014 Электронный ресурс / URL: http:// www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/17/us-views-of-technology-and-the-future/ Цифровое поколение России компетентность и безопасность Литература 373 determinants and gender differences // Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2010. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 415–426. Wängqvist M., Frisén A. Who am I online? Understanding the meaning of online contexts for identity development // Adolescent Research Review. 2016. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 139–151. Ward A.F. Supernormal: How the Internet is changing our memories and our minds // Psychological Inquiry. 2013. Vol. 24. № 4. P. 341–348. Webb T.L., Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence // Psychological bulletin. 2006. Vol. 132. № 2. P. 249–268. Wegner D.M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind // Theories of group behavior. N.Y.: Springer, 1987. P. 185–208. Weigel M., Heikkinen K. Developing minds with digital media: Habits of mind in the YouTube era. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2007. Weil M.M., Rosen L.D. A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from 23 countries // Computers in human behavior. 1995. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 95–133. Widyanto L., Griffiths M., Brunsden V. A psychometric comparison of the Internet Addiction Test, the Internet-Related Problem Scale and self-diag- nosis // Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2011. Vol. 14, iss. 3. P. 141–149. Widyanto L., Griffiths M., Brunsden V., McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the Internet Related Problem Scale: a pilot study // International Journal of Mental Health Addiction. 2008. Vol. 6. P. 205–213. Wilmer H.H., Sherman L.E., Chein J.M. Smartphones and Cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8 (605). P. 1–16. Wilson R.E., Gosling S.D., Graham L.T. A review of Facebook research in the social sciences // Perspectives on psychological science. 2012. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 203–220. Wrosch C., Scheier M.F., Carver Sh.S., Schulz R. The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial // Self and Identity. 2003. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 1–20. Wu Y.J., Outley O., Matarrita-Cascante D., Murphrey T.P. A systematic review of recent research on adolescent social connectedness and mental health with internet technology use // Adolescent Research Review. 2016. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 153–162. Yang C., Brown B.B. Motives for using Facebook, patterns of Facebook activities, and late adolescents’ social adjustment to college // Journal of youth and adolescence. 2013. Vol. 42. № 3. P. 403–416. Yang X., Zhu L. Predictors of media multitasking in Chinese adolescents // International Journal of Psychology. 2016. Vol. 51. № 6. P. 430–438. Thorpe S.J., Brosnan M.J. Does computer anxiety reach levels which conform to DSM IV criteria for specific phobia? // Computers in Human Behavior. 2007. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 1258–1272. Tsitsika A.K., Tzavela E.C., Janikian M., Ólafsson K., Iordache A., Schoenmakers T. M. Online social networking in adolescence: Patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning // Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014. Vol. 55. № 1. P. 141–147. Turel O., Serenko A., Giles P. Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of online auction users // Mis Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 35. № 4. P. 1043–1062. Turkle Sh. Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1995. Uncapher M.R., Thieu M.K., Wagner A.D. Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory // Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2016. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 483–490. Valenzuela S., Park N., Kee K.F. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation // Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2009. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 875–901. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks // Journal of adolescent health. 2011. Vol. 48. № 2. P. 121–127. Valkenburg P.M., Schouten A.P., Peter J. Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet // New media & society. 2005. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 383–402. Van der Heijden H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems // MIS quarterly. 2004. Vol. 28. № 4. P. 695–704. Vandebosch H., Van Cleemput K. Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters // CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2008. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 499–503. VanDeventer S.S., White J.A. Expert behavior in children’s video game play // Simulation & Gaming. 2002. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 28–48. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view // MIS quarterly. 2003. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 425–478. Verleye K. The co-creation experience from the customer perspective: its measurement and determinants // Journal of Service Management. 2015. Vol. 26. № 2. P. 321–342. Visser S.N., Danielson M.L., Bitsko R.H., Perou R., Blumberg S.J. Trends in the parent-report of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States, 2003–2011 // Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2014. Vol. 53. P. 34– 46. Wang H.Y., Wang S.H. User acceptance of mobile internet based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: Investigating the Цифровое поколение России компетентность и безопасность M.L., Mitchell K. Youth engaging in online harassment: associa- tions with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal character- istics // Journal of Adolescence. 2004. Vol. 27. P. 319–336. Young K.S. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder // Cyberpsychology & behavior. 1998. Vol. 1. № 3. P. 237–244. Zakour A.B. Information technology acceptance across cultures // Law W.K. (Ed.). Information Resources Management: Global Challenges. Hershey (PA): Idea, 2007. P. 25–53. Zamarro G., Hitt C., Mendez I. When Students Don’t Care: Reexamin- ing International Differences in Achievement and Non-cognitive Skills Электронный ресурс // Working Paper Series. Oktober, 2016 / URL: http://www. uaedreform.org/downloads/2016/10/when-students-dont-care-reexamining- international-differences-in-achievement-and-non-cognitive-skills.pdf Zywica J., Danowski J. The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook™ and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 1–34. Солдатова Галина Уртанбековна — член-корреспондент РАО, доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры психологии личности факультета психологии МГУ имени МВ. Ломоносова. Лауреат Премия правительства РФ в области образования (2010 г. Автор свыше 300 работ в области психологии межэтнических отношений, психологии межкультурных коммуникаций, психологии идентичности, конфликта и межэтнической напряженности, психологии миграций, психологии ксенофобии, психология толерантности, психологии переговоров, исследования социально- психологических аспектов влияния интернета на развитие личности и общества. Рассказова Елена Игоревна — кандидат психологических наук, доцент кафедры нейро- и патопсихологии факультета психологии МГУ имени МВ. Ломоносова, ведущий научный сотрудник международной лаборатории позитивной психологии личности и мотивации НИУ ВШЭ. Сфера научных интересов психология саморегуляции, позитивная психология, психосома тика, психология здоровья, математические методы в психологии. Нестик Тимофей Александрович — доктор психологических наук, кандидат философских наук, и.о. заведующего лабораторией социальной и экономической психологии Института Психологии РАН, ведущий научный сотрудник, кафедры психологии личности факультета психологии МГУ имени МВ. Ломоносова. Профессор РАН. Член Международной ассоциации прикладной психологии (IAAP), Международной ассоциации фасилитаторов (IAF). Сфера научных интересов социальная психология времени, групповая рефлексивность и когнитивные процессы в малых группах, психологические аспекты социального капитала и формирования доверия в организациях, психология коллективного творчества и управления знаниями в организации, психология социального прогнозирования, психология глобальных рисков. Научное издание Солдатова Галина Уртанбековна Рассказова Елена Игоревна Нестик Тимофей Александрович ЦИФРОВОЕ ПОКОЛЕНИЕ РОССИИ: КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТь И БЕЗОПАСНОСТь Редактор Е.Г. Лунякова Корректор А.П. Мартынова Верстка В.Н. Кокорев Директор издательства ДА. Леонтьев Издательство Смысл (ООО НПФ «Смысл») Тел./факс 8 499 189-95-88 e-mail: info@smysl.ru Подписано в печать 25.10.2017. Формат Бумага офсетная. Печать офсетная. Усл. печ. л. 23,5. Тираж 300 экз. Заказ |